These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18715261)

  • 1. Robust representation of dry cells in single-layer MODFLOW models.
    Painter S; Başağaoğlu H; Liu A
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):873-81. PubMed ID: 18715261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grid cell distortion and MODFLOW's integrated finite-difference numerical solution.
    Romero DM; Silver SE
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 17087751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approaches to the simulation of unconfined flow and perched groundwater flow in MODFLOW.
    Bedekar V; Niswonger RG; Kipp K; Panday S; Tonkin M
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 21635246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial periodic boundary condition for MODFLOW.
    Laattoe T; Post VE; Werner AD
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(4):606-12. PubMed ID: 23808416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An assembly model for simulation of large-scale ground water flow and transport.
    Huang J; Christ JA; Goltz MN
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 18715260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Picard and Newton iteration for solving nonlinear ground water flow equations.
    Mehl S
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 16857036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulating piecewise-linear surface water and ground water interactions with MODFLOW.
    Zaadnoordijk WJ
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):723-6. PubMed ID: 19473274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction with MODFLOW: some considerations.
    Brunner P; Simmons CT; Cook PG; Therrien R
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19891721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using MODFLOW 2000 to model ET and recharge for shallow ground water problems.
    Doble RC; Simmons CT; Walker GR
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 18624693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of local grid refinement methods for MODFLOW.
    Mehl S; Hill MC; Leake SA
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(6):792-6. PubMed ID: 17087750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved calculations for dewatered cells in MODFLOW.
    Doherty J
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 11708452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A compartmental-spatial system dynamics approach to ground water modeling.
    Roach J; Tidwell V
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):686-98. PubMed ID: 19459984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stable and efficient numerical algorithm for unconfined aquifer analysis.
    Keating E; Zyvoloski G
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(4):569-79. PubMed ID: 19341374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling effects of multinode wells on solute transport.
    Konikow LF; Hornberger GZ
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):648-60. PubMed ID: 16961486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonlinear Flow Process: A New Package to Compute Nonlinear Flow in MODFLOW.
    Mayaud C; Walker P; Hergarten S; Birk S
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 25059312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive underrelaxation of Picard iterations in ground water models.
    Durbin T; Delemos D
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(5):648-51. PubMed ID: 17760590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting collector well yields with MODFLOW.
    Kelson V
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(6):918-26. PubMed ID: 22339406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation of solute transport across low-permeability barrier walls.
    Harte PT; Konikow LF; Hornberger GZ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 May; 85(3-4):247-70. PubMed ID: 16600421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hybrid finite-difference and analytic element groundwater model.
    Haitjema HM; Feinstein DT; Hunt RJ; Gusyev MA
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(4):538-48. PubMed ID: 20132324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating ground water recharge using flow models of perched karstic aquifers.
    Weiss M; Gvirtzman H
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(6):761-73. PubMed ID: 17973754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.