876 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18715414)
21. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Labor induction by vaginal misoprostol in grand multiparous women.
Bique C; Bugalho A; Bergström S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Mar; 78(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 10078580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Castañeda CS; Izquierdo Puente JC; Leon Ochoa RA; Plasse TF; Powers BL; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. PubMed ID: 16157114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
Wing DA;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A
Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening.
Silfeler DB; Tandogan B; Ayvaci H; Silfeler I; Yenidede I; Dayicioglu V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1331-7. PubMed ID: 21290140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Vaginal misoprostol for term labor induction.
Bauer TA; Brown DL; Chai LK
Ann Pharmacother; 1997 Nov; 31(11):1391-3. PubMed ID: 9391696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester.
Abbasi N; Danish N; Shakoor F; Parveen Z; Bilal SA
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 19610511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
Hassan AA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Tan PC; Valiapan SD; Tay PY; Omar SZ
BJOG; 2007 Jul; 114(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 17506788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy.
Preutthipan S; Herabutya Y
Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):990-4. PubMed ID: 16949590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening.
Charoenkul S; Sripramote M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
