BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18715778)

  • 21. Identification and clinical validation of a multigene assay that interrogates the biology of cancer stem cells and predicts metastasis in breast cancer: A retrospective consecutive study.
    Pece S; Disalvatore D; Tosoni D; Vecchi M; Confalonieri S; Bertalot G; Viale G; Colleoni M; Veronesi P; Galimberti V; Di Fiore PP
    EBioMedicine; 2019 Apr; 42():352-362. PubMed ID: 30846393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term impact of the 70-gene signature on breast cancer outcome.
    Drukker CA; van Tinteren H; Schmidt MK; Rutgers EJ; Bernards R; van de Vijver MJ; Van't Veer LJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Feb; 143(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 24445566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A gene signature for late distant metastasis in breast cancer identifies a potential mechanism of late recurrences.
    Mittempergher L; Saghatchian M; Wolf DM; Michiels S; Canisius S; Dessen P; Delaloge S; Lazar V; Benz SC; Tursz T; Bernards R; van't Veer LJ
    Mol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 7(5):987-99. PubMed ID: 23910573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A gene expression signature identifies two prognostic subgroups of basal breast cancer.
    Sabatier R; Finetti P; Cervera N; Lambaudie E; Esterni B; Mamessier E; Tallet A; Chabannon C; Extra JM; Jacquemier J; Viens P; Birnbaum D; Bertucci F
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Apr; 126(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 20490655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identification of a prognostic LncRNA signature for ER-positive, ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancers.
    Liu D
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 32601968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic breast cancer signature identified from 3D culture model accurately predicts clinical outcome across independent datasets.
    Martin KJ; Patrick DR; Bissell MJ; Fournier MV
    PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e2994. PubMed ID: 18714348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Subtype-specific prognostic impact of different immune signatures in node-negative breast cancer.
    Heimes AS; Madjar K; Edlund K; Battista MJ; Almstedt K; Elger T; Krajnak S; Rahnenführer J; Brenner W; Hasenburg A; Hengstler JG; Schmidt M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Sep; 165(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 28585074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prognostic relevance of carcinoembryonic antigen and estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patients.
    Esteban JM; Felder B; Ahn C; Simpson JF; Battifora H; Shively JE
    Cancer; 1994 Sep; 74(5):1575-83. PubMed ID: 7914825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Systematic assessment of prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer shows distinct influence of time and ER status.
    Zhao X; Rødland EA; Sørlie T; Vollan HK; Russnes HG; Kristensen VN; Lingjærde OC; Børresen-Dale AL
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Mar; 14():211. PubMed ID: 24645668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Population-based molecular prognosis of breast cancer by transcriptional profiling.
    Ma Y; Qian Y; Wei L; Abraham J; Shi X; Castranova V; Harner EJ; Flynn DC; Guo L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(7):2014-22. PubMed ID: 17404081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A specific gene expression signature for visceral organ metastasis in breast cancer.
    Savci-Heijink CD; Halfwerk H; Koster J; Horlings HM; van de Vijver MJ
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):333. PubMed ID: 30961553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Protein interaction network underpins concordant prognosis among heterogeneous breast cancer signatures.
    Chen J; Sam L; Huang Y; Lee Y; Li J; Liu Y; Xing HR; Lussier YA
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Jun; 43(3):385-96. PubMed ID: 20350617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of a New Eight-Long Noncoding RNA Molecular Signature for Breast Cancer Survival Prediction.
    Zhang Y; Li Z; Chen M; Chen H; Zhong Q; Liang L; Li B
    DNA Cell Biol; 2019 Dec; 38(12):1529-1539. PubMed ID: 31647329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Next generation sequencing-based expression profiling identifies signatures from benign stromal proliferations that define stromal components of breast cancer.
    Guo X; Zhu SX; Brunner AL; van de Rijn M; West RB
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):R117. PubMed ID: 24342436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A qualitative transcriptional signature to reclassify histological grade of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
    Li J; Jiang W; Liang Q; Liu G; Dai Y; Zheng H; Yang J; Cai H; Zheng G
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):283. PubMed ID: 32252627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. RERG (Ras-like, oestrogen-regulated, growth-inhibitor) expression in breast cancer: a marker of ER-positive luminal-like subtype.
    Habashy HO; Powe DG; Glaab E; Ball G; Spiteri I; Krasnogor N; Garibaldi JM; Rakha EA; Green AR; Caldas C; Ellis IO
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jul; 128(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 20697807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of public cancer datasets and signatures identifies TP53 mutant signatures with robust prognostic and predictive value.
    Lehmann BD; Ding Y; Viox DJ; Jiang M; Zheng Y; Liao W; Chen X; Xiang W; Yi Y
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Mar; 15():179. PubMed ID: 25886164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gene expression profiling to predict the risk of locoregional recurrence in breast cancer: a pooled analysis.
    Drukker CA; Elias SG; Nijenhuis MV; Wesseling J; Bartelink H; Elkhuizen P; Fowble B; Whitworth PW; Patel RR; de Snoo FA; van 't Veer LJ; Beitsch PD; Rutgers EJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Dec; 148(3):599-613. PubMed ID: 25414025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gene expression profiles associated with the presence of a fibrotic focus and the growth pattern in lymph node-negative breast cancer.
    Van den Eynden GG; Smid M; Van Laere SJ; Colpaert CG; Van der Auwera I; Bich TX; van Dam P; den Bakker MA; Dirix LY; Van Marck EA; Vermeulen PB; Foekens JA
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 May; 14(10):2944-52. PubMed ID: 18483361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A core invasiveness gene signature reflects epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition but not metastatic potential in breast cancer cell lines and tissue samples.
    Marsan M; Van den Eynden G; Limame R; Neven P; Hauspy J; Van Dam PA; Vergote I; Dirix LY; Vermeulen PB; Van Laere SJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89262. PubMed ID: 24586640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.