These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18716326)

  • 1. Second-order moments of segregating sites under variable population size.
    Zivković D; Wiehe T
    Genetics; 2008 Sep; 180(1):341-57. PubMed ID: 18716326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.
    Campos JL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):287-303. PubMed ID: 30923166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model.
    Charlesworth D; Charlesworth B; Morgan MT
    Genetics; 1995 Dec; 141(4):1619-32. PubMed ID: 8601499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biases in ARG-Based Inference of Historical Population Size in Populations Experiencing Selection.
    Marsh JI; Johri P
    Mol Biol Evol; 2024 Jul; 41(7):. PubMed ID: 38874402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps II: Examining recent evidence from humans, flies, and viruses.
    Harris RB; Sackman A; Jensen JD
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1007859. PubMed ID: 30592709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple Modes of Positive Selection Shaping the Patterns of Incomplete Selective Sweeps over African Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Vy HMT; Won YJ; Kim Y
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Nov; 34(11):2792-2807. PubMed ID: 28981697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reanalysis of protein polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana: effects of population size and selection.
    Morton RA; Choudhary M; Cariou ML; Singh RS
    Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):101-14. PubMed ID: 15088651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms.
    Braverman JM; Hudson RR; Kaplan NL; Langley CH; Stephan W
    Genetics; 1995 Jun; 140(2):783-96. PubMed ID: 7498754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection for population-specific adaptation shaped patterns of variation in the photoperiod pathway genes in Arabidopsis lyrata during post-glacial colonization.
    Mattila TM; Aalto EA; Toivainen T; Niittyvuopio A; Piltonen S; Kuittinen H; Savolainen O
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(2):581-97. PubMed ID: 26600237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A haplotype method detects diverse scenarios of local adaptation from genomic sequence variation.
    Lange JD; Pool JE
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3081-100. PubMed ID: 27135633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.
    Vy HM; Kim Y
    Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):633-49. PubMed ID: 25911658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An approximate bayesian estimator suggests strong, recurrent selective sweeps in Drosophila.
    Jensen JD; Thornton KR; Andolfatto P
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000198. PubMed ID: 18802463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting the footprint of positive selection in a european population of Drosophila melanogaster: multilocus pattern of variation and distance to coding regions.
    Orengo DJ; Aguadé M
    Genetics; 2004 Aug; 167(4):1759-66. PubMed ID: 15342514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of selective sweeps using a dynamically adjusted number of linked microsatellites.
    Wiehe T; Nolte V; Zivkovic D; Schlötterer C
    Genetics; 2007 Jan; 175(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 17057237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Buzbas EO; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005004. PubMed ID: 25706129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the biases in the estimation of deleterious mutation parameters from natural populations at mutation-selection balance.
    Caballero A
    Genet Res; 2006 Dec; 88(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 17371612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring the demographic history and rate of adaptive substitution in Drosophila.
    Li H; Stephan W
    PLoS Genet; 2006 Oct; 2(10):e166. PubMed ID: 17040129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dominance shifts increase the likelihood of soft selective sweeps.
    Muralidhar P; Veller C
    Evolution; 2022 May; 76(5):966-984. PubMed ID: 35213740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The recent demographic and adaptive history of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Stephan W; Li H
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Feb; 98(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 17006533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.