These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18716346)

  • 1. Uncertainty evaluation and expression in dose and risk assessment.
    Allisy-Roberts P; Day P
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 18716346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RBE and wR values of sparsely ionising radiations.
    Chadwwick KH; leenhouts HP
    J Radiol Prot; 2007 Dec; 27(4):503-4. PubMed ID: 18273998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RBE and w(R) values of Auger emitters and low-range beta emitters with particular reference to tritium.
    Fairlie I
    J Radiol Prot; 2007 Jun; 27(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 17664661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-dose extrapolation of radiation health risks: some implications of uncertainty for radiation protection at low doses.
    Land CE
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 19820450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
    Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The application of effective dose to medical exposures.
    Martin CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17951608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break.
    Leonard BE
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
    Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relevance of dose for low-energy beta emitters.
    Goodhead DT
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 19690362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation process and uncertainty budget: a recommended approach for performance verification.
    Suárez RC; Zeger J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):52-5. PubMed ID: 18334543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulating under uncertainty: newsboy for exposure limits.
    Cooke RM; Macdonell M
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):577-87. PubMed ID: 18643816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of tritium beta particles.
    Bridges BA
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18309190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental derivation of relative biological effectiveness of A-bomb neutrons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and implications for risk assessment.
    Sasaki MS; Nomura T; Ejima Y; Utsumi H; Endo S; Saito I; Itoh T; Hoshi M
    Radiat Res; 2008 Jul; 170(1):101-17. PubMed ID: 18582156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comment on the invited editorial 'Effectiveness of tritium beta particles'.
    Müller WU
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):249-52; author reply 250-1. PubMed ID: 18506081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principles of protection: a formal approach for evaluating dose distributions.
    Wikman-Svahn P; Peterson M; Hansson SO
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Mar; 26(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 16522945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal dose assessments: uncertainty studies and update of ideas guidelines and databases within CONRAD project.
    Marsh JW; Castellani CM; Hurtgen C; Lopez MA; Andrasi A; Bailey MR; Birchall A; Blanchardon E; Desai AD; Dorrian MD; Doerfel H; Koukouliou V; Luciani A; Malatova I; Molokanov A; Puncher M; Vrba T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 18718961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The computer as an active element in dosimetry.
    Turner JE; Birkhoff RD; Wright HA; Hamm RN
    Health Phys; 1979 Mar; 36(3):429. PubMed ID: 489294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radioecology, radiobiology, and radiological protection: frameworks and fractures.
    Pentreath RJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1019-26. PubMed ID: 19608309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of uncertainty of model parameters on estimates of committed dose equivalent.
    Wise KN
    Health Phys; 1985 Apr; 48(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 3980234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear cardiology: radiation dosimetry, uncertainties, and risk.
    Stabin MG
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 49(9):1555-63. PubMed ID: 18765586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.