These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1871666)

  • 1. [The suitability of the surface-dose product for the evaluation of different film-screen systems in relation to their sensitivity in practice].
    Weidenmaier W; Merz T; Schumacher KA
    Rontgenpraxis; 1991 Jun; 44(6):185-8. PubMed ID: 1871666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A protocol for evaluating screen-film systems].
    Benini L; Gozzi G; Bellis G; De Guarrini F; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1992; 84(1-2):92-7. PubMed ID: 1509153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Sensitivity S of film-screen systems and mode of operation of different automatic exposure systems in general practice conditions. II: Automatic exposure systems].
    Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Nov; 7(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 9467029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Speed S sensitivity of film-screen systems and mode of action of different automatic illumination in general practice. I: Film-screen systems].
    Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 9410006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of the quality of screen-film radiographic systems: physical principles and methods of measurement].
    Borasi G; Berardi P; Ferretti PP; Piccagli V
    Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 2236696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality assurance in radiology: quality control of radiographic cassettes].
    Ferretti PP; Sarti M; Messori P; Boni L; Seligardi P; Tassoni D; Cattini V; Piccagli V; Barani A; Bianchi C; Borasi G; Troiso A; Soliani Raschini C
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 8975314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [X-ray intensifying screens: their effect on the quality of the image and the degree of irradiation].
    Tombak MI; Vlasov PV; Gurvich AM; Gurevich IA; Katomina RV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1984; (5):80-4. PubMed ID: 6528468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
    Maurer HJ; Goos F
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The parameters of image quality of a novel ultra high resolution film-screen system].
    Beutel J; Mickewich DJ; Issler SL; Shaw R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8136386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The choice of radiographic film-screen systems: quality evaluation and purchasing specifications drafting. Report on A.I.F.B. Working Group activity.
    Borasi G; Bregant P; Crespi A; De Denaro M; Ferretti PP; De Guarrini F; Levrero F; Mozzo P; Novario R; Pedroli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 May; 85(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 8327771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients].
    Maccia C; Docou le Pointe H; Fery-Lemonnier E; Nadeau X; Montagne JP; Charpentier E; Ariche-Cohen M; Viens-Bitker C
    J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1129-34. PubMed ID: 9033870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
    Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Physical and psychophysical criteria for the evaluation of the quality of radiographic images].
    Borasi G; Delpiano S; Landini A; Orsini S; Papagni L; Tosi G
    Radiol Med; 1982 May; 68(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 7111792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Recent developments in x-ray luminescent imaging systems].
    Gurvic AM; Wolf M; Starick D
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 2236548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.