These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

749 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18717085)

  • 61. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials.
    Barghi N; Ontiveros JC
    Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chew CL; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 8148022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Issues in handling impression materials.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Büchler A; Lauer HC; Hoffmann A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 11951807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut.
    Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG; Cardoso A; Gomes EA; Tabata LF; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions.
    Lee SJ; Macarthur RX; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):420-3. PubMed ID: 23998623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. In vitro study of transmission of bacteria from contaminated metal models to stone models via impressions.
    Sofou A; Larsen T; Owall B; Fiehn NE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 12271350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparative analysis of dimensional precision of different silicone impression materials.
    Al-Zarea BK; Sughaireen MG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 22186818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A simple open-tray implant impression technique.
    Windhorn RJ; Gunnell TR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Sep; 96(3):220-1. PubMed ID: 16990075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. An implant impression technique using a plaster splinting index combined with a silicone impression.
    Eid N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15583565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
    Togano H; Hideshima M; Ohyama T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. An implant-transfer technique without impression material.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Aparecida Delben J; dos-Santos PH; Ricardo Barão VA; Tabata LF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1274-6. PubMed ID: 20613612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A clinical report on the use of closed-tray, hex-lock-friction-fit implant impression copings.
    Raviv E; Hanna J; Raviv R; Harel-Raviv M
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 25106009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy die material using different polymerization methods.
    Prisco R; Cozzolino G; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Cardoso A; Rocha EP; Gomes EA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 18784525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Using silicone impression material and acrylic resin to fabricate remount casts for removable partial dentures.
    Hsu YT; Farmer JB
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 16011626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Shark fin test and impression quality: a correlation analysis.
    Balkenhol M; Wöstmann B; Kanehira M; Finger WJ
    J Dent; 2007 May; 35(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 17254690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.