These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18717171)

  • 21. Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation.
    Kim JH; Cho BH; Lee JH; Kwon SJ; Yi YA; Shin Y; Roh BD; Seo DG
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Feb; 73(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 25299600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Influence of coping material selection and porcelain firing on marginal and internal fit of computer-aided design/computer- aided manufacturing of zirconia and titanium ceramic implant-supported crowns].
    Cuiling L; Liyuan Y; Xu G; Hong S
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 34(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 27526450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
    Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Single crowns with CAD/CAM-fabricated copings from titanium: 6-year clinical results.
    Hey J; Beuer F; Bensel T; Boeckler AF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 24529840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown.
    May KB; Russell MM; Razzoog ME; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):394-404. PubMed ID: 9791784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The fit of crowns produced using digital impression systems.
    Vennerstrom M; Fakhary M; Von Steyern PV
    Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 25796804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium ceramic single crowns: a three-year follow up.
    Boeckler AF; Lee H; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 19853170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
    J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
    Luthardt RG; Bornemann G; Lemelson S; Walter MH; Hüls A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions.
    Tamim H; Skjerven H; Ekfeldt A; Rønold HJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 25010876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Internal Adaptation of Implant-Supported, Polymer-Infused Ceramic Crowns Fabricated by Two CAD/CAM Systems.
    Talic R; Alfadda SA
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Dec; 27(9):868-876. PubMed ID: 30350377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
    Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.