233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18718796)
1. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography.
de Oliveira AE; Cevidanes LH; Phillips C; Motta A; Burke B; Tyndall D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):256-65. PubMed ID: 18718796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis.
Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Jul; 17(4):e678-88. PubMed ID: 22322503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
Naji P; Alsufyani NA; Lagravère MO
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative validity and reproducibility study of various landmark-oriented reference planes in 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis for patients receiving orthognathic surgery.
Lin HH; Chuang YF; Weng JL; Lo LJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117604. PubMed ID: 25668209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 21889058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Liberton DK; Verma P; Contratto A; Lee JS
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):e611-e615. PubMed ID: 31478954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cephalometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Cassetta M; Altieri F; Di Giorgio R; Silvestri A
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):e311-5. PubMed ID: 26080244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
