These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Does hard insertion and space improve shock absorption ability of mouthguard? Takeda T; Ishigami K; Handa J; Naitoh K; Kurokawa K; Shibusawa M; Nakajima K; Kawamura S Dent Traumatol; 2006 Apr; 22(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 16499630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fabricating a better mouthguard. Part I: factors influencing mouthguard thinning. Del Rossi G; Leyte-Vidal MA Dent Traumatol; 2007 Jun; 23(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 17511836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A technique for fabricating modern athletic mouthguards. Padilla RR J Calif Dent Assoc; 2005 May; 33(5):399-408. PubMed ID: 16033039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Easy fabrication of a new type of mouthguard incorporating a hard insert and space and offering improved shock absorption ability. Takeda T; Ishigami K; Mishima O; Karasawa K; Kurokawa K; Kajima T; Nakajima K Dent Traumatol; 2011 Dec; 27(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 21854544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of mouthguards among 12- to 14-year-old Ontario schoolchildren. Fakhruddin KS; Lawrence HP; Kenny DJ; Locker D J Can Dent Assoc; 2007; 73(6):505. PubMed ID: 17672954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The orthodontic sports protection appliance. Pacheco G; Clemente MP; Vasconcelos M; Ferreira AP J Clin Orthod; 2010 Jan; 44(1):41-4; quiz 46. PubMed ID: 20503655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Thickness and stiffness characteristics of custom-made mouthguard materials. Waked EJ; Caputo AA Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):462-6. PubMed ID: 15954252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new technique for the custom fabrication of mouthguards with photopolymerized urethane diacrylate. Ranalli DN; Guevara PA Quintessence Int; 1992 Apr; 23(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 1502301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A technique for fabricating modern athletic mouthguards. Padilla RR Hawaii Dent J; 2009; 40(6):4, 6-12; quiz 17. PubMed ID: 20373728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of commercially available mouthguards and a custom mouthguard. Guevara PH; Hondrum SO; Reichl RB Gen Dent; 2001; 49(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 12016685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of impact object characteristics on impact force and force absorption by mouthguard material. Takeda T; Ishigami K; Shintaro K; Nakajima K; Shimada A; Regner CW Dent Traumatol; 2004 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 14998410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing comfort and wearability between Type III single-layered and double-layered EVA mouthguards. Kenyon BJ; Loos LG Gen Dent; 2005; 53(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 16158793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]