These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18721916)

  • 1. Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference.
    Simmons S; Estes Z
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):781-95. PubMed ID: 18721916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thematic relations affect similarity via commonalities.
    Golonka S; Estes Z
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1454-64. PubMed ID: 19857016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do taxonomic versus thematic relations impact similarity and difference judgments? An ERP study.
    Chen Q; Li P; Xi L; Li F; Lei Y; Li H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 23797148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations.
    Rosset E
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 18692779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The crossover effect of the propositional text representation and the mental model:the role of individual differences in spatial imagery ability].
    Dutke S
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(3):164-76. PubMed ID: 10474320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity judgments predict N400 amplitude differences between taxonomic category members and thematic associates.
    Honke G; Kurtz KJ; Laszlo S
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107388. PubMed ID: 32081617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scope of linguistic influence: does a classifier system alter object concepts?
    Saalbach H; Imai M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 17696695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Talk about categories versus individuals (generics vs. non-generics).
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2004; 69(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 15291776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.
    Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readers' experiences of characters' goals and actions.
    Egidi G; Gerrig RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1322-9. PubMed ID: 17087586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.
    Libben MR; Titone DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 19271853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting patterns of similarity among abstract semantic relations.
    Ichien N; Lu H; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):108-121. PubMed ID: 34197168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia: history and variability to clinical implications.
    Johnson D; Cannizzaro MS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Jan; 23(1):15-37. PubMed ID: 19148811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar.
    Zimmerer VC; Cowell PE; Varley RA
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 21264600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding one's meaning: a test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development.
    Barner D; Chow K; Yang SJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Mar; 58(2):195-219. PubMed ID: 18799157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluative priming from subliminal emotional words: insights from event-related potentials and individual differences related to anxiety.
    Gibbons H
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):383-400. PubMed ID: 19328727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality.
    Falmier O; Young ME
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):473-500. PubMed ID: 18792720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in semantic categorization.
    Pasterski V; Zwierzynska K; Estes Z
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1183-7. PubMed ID: 21516365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations.
    Mirman D; Graziano KM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Nov; 141(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 22201413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.