BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18722004)

  • 21. The health and economic impact of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.
    Wong G; Howard K; Webster A; Chapman JR; Craig JC
    Transplantation; 2009 Apr; 87(7):1078-91. PubMed ID: 19352131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mathematical models of cervical cancer prevention in the Asia Pacific region.
    Goldie SJ; Diaz M; Kim SY; Levin CE; Van Minh H; Kim JJ
    Vaccine; 2008 Aug; 26 Suppl 12():M17-29. PubMed ID: 18945411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer.
    Wu JC; Hakama M; Anttila A; Yen AM; Malila N; Sarkeala T; Auvinen A; Chiu SY; Chen HH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(2):553-66. PubMed ID: 20054645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
    Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-effectiveness of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (500/50 microg) in the treatment of COPD.
    Earnshaw SR; Wilson MR; Dalal AA; Chambers MG; Jhingran P; Stanford R; Mapel DW
    Respir Med; 2009 Jan; 103(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19010652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Screening for ovarian cancer].
    Bjørge T; Dørum A; Tropé CG
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 May; 120(12):1444-8. PubMed ID: 10851943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical considerations in cancer screening programs.
    Prorok PC; Connor RJ; Baker SG
    Urol Clin North Am; 1990 Nov; 17(4):699-708. PubMed ID: 2120836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
    Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of reproductive factors on mortality after epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis.
    Robbins CL; Whiteman MK; Hillis SD; Curtis KM; McDonald JA; Wingo PA; Kulkarni A; Marchbanks PA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jul; 18(7):2035-41. PubMed ID: 19589914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-benefit analysis of capsule endoscopy compared with standard upper endoscopy for the detection of Barrett's esophagus.
    Gerson L; Lin OS
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Mar; 5(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 17368231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effectiveness of screening for hepatopulmonary syndrome in liver transplant candidates.
    Roberts DN; Arguedas MR; Fallon MB
    Liver Transpl; 2007 Feb; 13(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 17205561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Primary surgery versus chemoradiation in the treatment of IB2 cervical carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis.
    Jewell EL; Kulasingam S; Myers ER; Alvarez Secord A; Havrilesky LJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):532-40. PubMed ID: 17900674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced MRI in high-risk women.
    Taneja C; Edelsberg J; Weycker D; Guo A; Oster G; Weinreb J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Mar; 6(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 19248993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori screening to prevent gastric cancer: Markov decision analysis].
    Wang Q; Jin PH; Lin GW; Xu SR; Chen J
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 24(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 12697117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An interim determination of health gain from oral cancer and precancer screening: 2. Developing a model of population screening.
    Downer MC; Jullien JA; Speight PM
    Community Dent Health; 1997 Dec; 14(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 9458580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.
    Cox B
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Aug; 17(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 18562953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Gonorrhea among females in private sector care.
    Bernstein KT; Mehta SD; Rompalo AM; Erbelding EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):813-21. PubMed ID: 16582117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The value of mammography in different ethnic groups in Israel--analysis of mortality reduction and costs using CAN*TROL.
    Rennert G
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):477-81. PubMed ID: 1723656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High participation rates are not necessary for cost-effective colorectal cancer screening.
    Howard K; Salkeld G; Irwig L; Adelstein BA
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 15949121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aggressive and complex surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: an economic analysis.
    Aletti GD; Podratz KC; Moriarty JP; Cliby WA; Long KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jan; 112(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 19027146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.