479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18722073)
1. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment.
Timmermans D; Molewijk B; Stiggelbout A; Kievit J
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Sep; 54(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15324976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations.
Lipkus IM
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 17873259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical geneticists' and genetic counselors' views on the communication of genetic risks: a qualitative study.
Henneman L; Marteau TM; Timmermans DR
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Oct; 73(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 18583088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health literacy and cancer risk perception: implications for genomic risk communication.
Brewer NT; Tzeng JP; Lillie SE; Edwards AS; Peppercorn JM; Rimer BK
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 19050227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines.
Raats CJ; van Veenendaal H; Versluijs MM; Burgers JS
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 18768285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats.
Brundage M; Feldman-Stewart D; Leis A; Bezjak A; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6949-56. PubMed ID: 16192583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the decision to undergo colorectal cancer screening: insights on patient preventive decision making.
Wackerbarth SB; Peters JC; Haist SA
Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S17-22. PubMed ID: 18725828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The decision evaluation scales.
Stalmeier PF; Roosmalen MS; Verhoef LC; Hoekstra-Weebers JE; Oosterwijk JC; Moog U; Hoogerbrugge N; van Daal WA
Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Jun; 57(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15893210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.
Miron-Shatz T; Hanoch Y; Graef D; Sagi M
J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 19657924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
Keller C; Siegrist M
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer risk assessment and prevention: a framework for shared decision-making consultations.
Ozanne EM; Klemp JR; Esserman LJ
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 16509834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concise evaluation of decision aids.
Stalmeier PF; Roosmalen MS
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jan; 74(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18775622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).
Hoffman RM; Couper MP; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Levin CA; McNaughton-Collins M; Helitzer DL; VanHoewyk J; Barry MJ
Arch Intern Med; 2009 Sep; 169(17):1611-8. PubMed ID: 19786681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expressing medicine side effects: assessing the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm, and the provision of baseline risk information.
Berry DC; Knapp P; Raynor T
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16242904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of absolute risks, relative risks, frequencies, and probabilities on decision quality.
Covey J
J Health Commun; 2011 Aug; 16(7):788-801. PubMed ID: 21614719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Communicating risk to emergency department patients with chest pain.
France J; Keen C; Bowyer S
Emerg Med J; 2008 May; 25(5):276-8. PubMed ID: 18434461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
