These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18722073)

  • 1. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment.
    Timmermans D; Molewijk B; Stiggelbout A; Kievit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Sep; 54(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15324976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
    Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations.
    Lipkus IM
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 17873259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
    Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical geneticists' and genetic counselors' views on the communication of genetic risks: a qualitative study.
    Henneman L; Marteau TM; Timmermans DR
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Oct; 73(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 18583088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health literacy and cancer risk perception: implications for genomic risk communication.
    Brewer NT; Tzeng JP; Lillie SE; Edwards AS; Peppercorn JM; Rimer BK
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 19050227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines.
    Raats CJ; van Veenendaal H; Versluijs MM; Burgers JS
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 18768285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats.
    Brundage M; Feldman-Stewart D; Leis A; Bezjak A; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6949-56. PubMed ID: 16192583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the decision to undergo colorectal cancer screening: insights on patient preventive decision making.
    Wackerbarth SB; Peters JC; Haist SA
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S17-22. PubMed ID: 18725828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The decision evaluation scales.
    Stalmeier PF; Roosmalen MS; Verhoef LC; Hoekstra-Weebers JE; Oosterwijk JC; Moog U; Hoogerbrugge N; van Daal WA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Jun; 57(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15893210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.
    Miron-Shatz T; Hanoch Y; Graef D; Sagi M
    J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 19657924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer risk assessment and prevention: a framework for shared decision-making consultations.
    Ozanne EM; Klemp JR; Esserman LJ
    Breast J; 2006; 12(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 16509834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concise evaluation of decision aids.
    Stalmeier PF; Roosmalen MS
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jan; 74(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18775622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).
    Hoffman RM; Couper MP; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Levin CA; McNaughton-Collins M; Helitzer DL; VanHoewyk J; Barry MJ
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Sep; 169(17):1611-8. PubMed ID: 19786681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expressing medicine side effects: assessing the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm, and the provision of baseline risk information.
    Berry DC; Knapp P; Raynor T
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16242904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of absolute risks, relative risks, frequencies, and probabilities on decision quality.
    Covey J
    J Health Commun; 2011 Aug; 16(7):788-801. PubMed ID: 21614719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communicating risk to emergency department patients with chest pain.
    France J; Keen C; Bowyer S
    Emerg Med J; 2008 May; 25(5):276-8. PubMed ID: 18434461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.