825 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18722148)
1. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
Treutwein M; Bogner L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experimental validation of a Monte Carlo-based treatment-planning system for electron beams].
Mika S; Christ G
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Mar; 183(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 17340074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo commissioning of clinical electron beams using large field measurements.
O'Shea TP; Sawkey DL; Foley MJ; Faddegon BA
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4083-105. PubMed ID: 20601775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a commercial TPS based on the VMC(++) Monte Carlo code for electron beams: commissioning and dosimetric comparison with EGSnrc in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms.
Ferretti A; Martignano A; Simonato F; Paiusco M
Phys Med; 2014 Feb; 30(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22824540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system.
Crop F; Reynaert N; Pittomvils G; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Vakaet L; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3275-90. PubMed ID: 17505102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Verification and application of the voxel-based Monte Carlo (VMC++) electron dose module of Oncentra MasterPlan].
Scherf C; Scherer J; Bogner L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Feb; 183(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 17294112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo simulation of a medical linear accelerator for radiotherapy use.
Serrano B; Hachem A; Franchisseur E; Hérault J; Marcié S; Costa A; Bensadoun RJ; Barthe J; Gérard JP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):506-9. PubMed ID: 16644964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of experimental 3D dose curves in a heterogeneous phantom with results obtained by MCNP5 simulation and those extracted from a commercial treatment planning system.
Juste B; Miró R; Campayo JM; Díez S; Verdú G
Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):913-7. PubMed ID: 19963391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of XiO Electron Monte Carlo-based calculations by measurements in a homogeneous phantom and by EGSnrc calculations in a heterogeneous phantom.
Edimo P; Kwato Njock MG; Vynckier S
Phys Med; 2013 Nov; 29(6):631-8. PubMed ID: 23010450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
