BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18722971)

  • 1. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality?
    Nezhat C; Lavie O; Lemyre M; Unal E; Nezhat CH; Nezhat F
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2620-2. PubMed ID: 18656185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
    Advincula AP; Song A
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy--a retrospective matched control study.
    Nezhat C; Lavie O; Hsu S; Watson J; Barnett O; Lemyre M
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 18377901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
    Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
    Chen CC; Falcone T
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Nezhat FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 19896593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
    Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal surgical staging for locally advanced cervical carcinoma in a gynecologic oncology fellowship training program.
    Lowe MP; Bahador A; Muderspach LI; Burnett A; Santos L; Caffrey A; Roman LD; Morrow CP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):391-7. PubMed ID: 16962520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted laparoscopic presacral neurectomy: feasibility, techniques, and operative outcomes.
    Nezhat C; Morozov V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 20621011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.
    Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning and teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures: do alternating trainees impair a laparoscopic surgeon's learning curve?
    Fleisch MC; Newton J; Steinmetz I; Whitehair J; Hallum A; Hatch KD
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 17478358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 72.