These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

791 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18723003)

  • 1. Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task.
    Potts GF; Wood SM; Kothmann D; Martin LE
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():126-39. PubMed ID: 18723003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional Selection of Feature Conjunctions Is Accomplished by Parallel and Independent Selection of Single Features.
    Andersen SK; Müller MM; Hillyard SA
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9912-9. PubMed ID: 26156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Good times for multisensory integration: Effects of the precision of temporal synchrony as revealed by gamma-band oscillations.
    Senkowski D; Talsma D; Grigutsch M; Herrmann CS; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):561-71. PubMed ID: 16542688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Event-related potentials and audiovisual stimuli: multimodal interactions.
    Czigler I; Balázs L
    Neuroreport; 2001 Feb; 12(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 11209924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects.
    Takegata R; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Varyagina O; Näätänen R; Winkler I
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 15953710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related potentials to auditory and visual selective attention in schizophrenia.
    Wood SM; Potts GF; Hall JF; Ulanday JB; Netsiri C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Apr; 60(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 16009438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Giard MH; Peronnet F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 Sep; 11(5):473-90. PubMed ID: 10511637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intermodal attention affects the processing of the temporal alignment of audiovisual stimuli.
    Talsma D; Senkowski D; Woldorff MG
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 198(2-3):313-28. PubMed ID: 19495733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive resources are distributed among the entire auditory landscape in auditory scene analysis.
    Symonds RM; Zhou JW; Cole SL; Brace KM; Sussman ES
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13487. PubMed ID: 31578762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.
    Woods DL; Alho K; Algazi A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 82(5):341-55. PubMed ID: 1374703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Updating the dual-mechanism model for cross-sensory attentional spreading: The influence of space-based visual selective attention.
    Zhao S; Li Y; Wang C; Feng C; Feng W
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Dec; 42(18):6038-6052. PubMed ID: 34553806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A crossmodal crossover: opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli.
    Jacoby O; Hall SE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 22465299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.
    Pratt H; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Brain Behav; 2015 Nov; 5(11):e00407. PubMed ID: 26664791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.