169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18723038)
1. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: a critical assessment of recent research.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2341-53. PubMed ID: 18723038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.
Ellis AW; Brysbaert M
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition?
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):2004-7. PubMed ID: 19133280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
McCormick SF; Davis CJ; Brysbaert M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 20804295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Split Fovea Theory and the Leicester critique: what do the data say?
Van der Haegen L; Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 19698725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: a factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception.
Brysbaert M
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 14967210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic stimulation studies of foveal representation.
Lavidor M; Walsh V
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 14967216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.
Ellis AW
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 14967218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.
Lavidor M; Walsh V
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 12729488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Foveational complexity in single word identification: contralateral visual pathways are advantaged over ipsilateral pathways.
Obregón M; Shillcock R
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3279-83. PubMed ID: 22982485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 9(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 19246332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading.
McDonald SA; Shillcock RC
Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):801-20. PubMed ID: 15639506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ERP evidence for the split fovea theory.
Martin CD; Thierry G; Démonet JF; Roberts M; Nazir T
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():212-20. PubMed ID: 17956755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
