These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18723931)

  • 1. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Liu H; Wu X
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Rong J; Chen WR; Gao F; Xu K; Wu X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Zhao Q; Du H; Daniel J; Street R
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of imaging performance of a taper optics CCD; FReLoN' camera designed for medical imaging.
    Coan P; Peterzol A; Fiedler S; Ponchut C; Labiche JC; Bravin A
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 2006 May; 13(Pt 3):260-70. PubMed ID: 16645252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW; Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):39-44. PubMed ID: 15933079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
    Padgett R; Kotre CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.