187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18724589)
21. Quality improvement or research? A report from the trenches.
Wise L
Am J Crit Care; 2008 Mar; 17(2):98-9. PubMed ID: 18310642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Comment on the contribution, "Intervention and promotion of ethical competence in geriatric nursing. Basic principles of quality assured professional nursing" by Ulf Dettman, issue 2/2006].
Lay R
Pflege Z; 2006 Jul; 59(7):404; author reply 404. PubMed ID: 16883735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Approved: 2008 thresholds for conditional accreditation and preliminary denial of accreditation.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Dec; 27(12):4, 11. PubMed ID: 18257445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. NCQA's new online survey tries to tame the paper tiger.
Berberabe T
Manag Care; 2004 Jul; 13(7):36-7. PubMed ID: 15347158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality assurance in jeopardy?
Martin JC
Dimens Health Serv; 1986 Nov; 63(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 3792691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The ethics of quality improvement research.
Siegel MD; Alfano SL
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):791-2. PubMed ID: 19325394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Five legal pitfalls of quality assurance.
Rozovksy LE; Rozovsky FA
Health Care (Don Mills); 1986 Jun; 28(5):22, 24. PubMed ID: 10277321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. It is the rare health care organization that has not implemented some type of quality program.
Schroeder P
J Nurs Care Qual; 1993 Jan; 7(2):vii. PubMed ID: 8428007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Do you discriminate? An internal self-assessment tool.
Healthc Benchmarks; 2001 Apr; 8(4):42-3. PubMed ID: 11330031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Should quality improvement projects require IRB approval?
Weiserbs KF; Lyutic L; Weinberg J
Acad Med; 2009 Feb; 84(2):153. PubMed ID: 19174653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality improvement or research? The ethics of hospital project oversight.
Morris PE; Dracup K
Am J Crit Care; 2007 Sep; 16(5):424-6. PubMed ID: 17724233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Clarification: details of elimination of four-month track record requirements decision.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Jan; 28(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 18286919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. When do ethical issues become legal issues?
Memel SL
Healthc Exec; 1987; 2(5):57. PubMed ID: 10302078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Benchmarking's role in driving performance.
Fibuch E; Van Way CW
Physician Exec; 2013; 39(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23437753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Doorway to quality nursing care.
Samuel SA
Nurs J India; 1985 May; 76(5):113. PubMed ID: 3850554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Empathy and healthcare disparities.
Gerkin DG
Tenn Med; 2007 Oct; 100(10):6-8. PubMed ID: 17966705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Measuring productivity in health care.
Green R
Aust Health Rev; 1995; 18(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 10152268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. John Katsianis: connecting purpose and goals for quality improvement.
Katsianis J
Healthc Financ Manage; 2011 Mar; 65(3):28-9. PubMed ID: 21449301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Panel lays a framework for ethical conduct in QI.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Jun; 14(6):67-9. PubMed ID: 17520876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Introduction: quality improvement in public sector healthcare organizations.
Cochran CR
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2004; 27(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 15962574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
