BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18725839)

  • 21. Role of double-contrast barium enema in colorectal cancer screening based on fecal occult blood.
    Ciatto S; Castiglione G
    Tumori; 2002; 88(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 12088265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Primary care, economic barriers to health care, and use of colorectal cancer screening tests among Medicare enrollees over time.
    Doubeni CA; Laiyemo AO; Young AC; Klabunde CN; Reed G; Field TS; Fletcher RH
    Ann Fam Med; 2010; 8(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 20644184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Colorectal cancer screening behavior in women attending screening mammography: longitudinal trends and predictors.
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Abrahamse PH; Dong Q; Patterson SK; Bernstein SJ
    Womens Health Issues; 2005; 15(6):249-57. PubMed ID: 16325138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of self-reported history of colorectal cancer screening.
    Khoja S; McGregor SE; Hilsden RJ
    Can Fam Physician; 2007 Jul; 53(7):1192-7. PubMed ID: 17872816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Colorectal cancer screening with double-contrast barium enema: a national survey of diagnostic radiologists.
    Klabunde CN; Jones E; Brown ML; Davis WW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1419-27. PubMed ID: 12438029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration.
    Partin MR; Powell AA; Bangerter A; Halek K; Burgess JF; Fisher DA; Nelson DB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Dec; 27(12):1618-25. PubMed ID: 22810358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.
    Singh H; Kadiyala H; Bhagwath G; Shethia A; El-Serag H; Walder A; Velez ME; Petersen LA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 104(4):942-52. PubMed ID: 19293786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physicians' use of nonphysician healthcare providers for colorectal cancer screening.
    Sansbury LB; Klabunde CN; Mysliwiec P; Brown ML
    Am J Prev Med; 2003 Oct; 25(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 14507523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States.
    Klabunde CN; Cronin KA; Breen N; Waldron WR; Ambs AH; Nadel MR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Aug; 20(8):1611-21. PubMed ID: 21653643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Repeated Automated Mobile Text Messaging Reminders for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Azulay R; Valinsky L; Hershkowitz F; Magnezi R
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e11114. PubMed ID: 30720439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?
    Vernon SW; Tiro JA; Vojvodic RW; Coan S; Diamond PM; Greisinger A; Fernandez ME
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):758-67. PubMed ID: 18381467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity of four self-reported colorectal cancer screening modalities in a general population: differences over time and by intervention assignment.
    Jones RM; Mongin SJ; Lazovich D; Church TR; Yeazel MW
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):777-84. PubMed ID: 18381476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.
    Allison JE; Sakoda LC; Levin TR; Tucker JP; Tekawa IS; Cuff T; Pauly MP; Shlager L; Palitz AM; Zhao WK; Schwartz JS; Ransohoff DF; Selby JV
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1462-70. PubMed ID: 17895475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening.
    Leard LE; Savides TJ; Ganiats TG
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Sep; 45(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 9300000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Population screening for colorectal cancer: advantages and drawbacks.
    Kronborg O; Regula J
    Dig Dis; 2007; 25(3):270-3. PubMed ID: 17827954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening.
    Guerra CE; Schwartz JS; Armstrong K; Brown JS; Halbert CH; Shea JA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1681-8. PubMed ID: 17939007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Challenges in the management of positive fecal occult blood tests.
    Rao SK; Schilling TF; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2009 Mar; 24(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 19130147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Persistent demographic differences in colorectal cancer screening utilization despite Medicare reimbursement.
    Ko CW; Kreuter W; Baldwin LM
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2005 Mar; 5():10. PubMed ID: 15755323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adherence to follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test in an organized colorectal cancer screening program in Korea, 2004-2008.
    Choi KS; Lee HY; Jun JK; Shin A; Park EC
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1070-7. PubMed ID: 22004224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic testing following fecal occult blood screening in the elderly.
    Lurie JD; Welch HG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1999 Oct; 91(19):1641-6. PubMed ID: 10511591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.