286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18725950)
1. A feature-based approach to modeling protein-DNA interactions.
Sharon E; Lubliner S; Segal E
PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Aug; 4(8):e1000154. PubMed ID: 18725950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of context-dependent motifs by contrasting ChIP binding data.
Mason MJ; Plath K; Zhou Q
Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 26(22):2826-32. PubMed ID: 20870645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informative priors based on transcription factor structural class improve de novo motif discovery.
Narlikar L; Gordân R; Ohler U; Hartemink AJ
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e384-92. PubMed ID: 16873497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MACE: model based analysis of ChIP-exo.
Wang L; Chen J; Wang C; Uusküla-Reimand L; Chen K; Medina-Rivera A; Young EJ; Zimmermann MT; Yan H; Sun Z; Zhang Y; Wu ST; Huang H; Wilson MD; Kocher JP; Li W
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Nov; 42(20):e156. PubMed ID: 25249628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape.
Zhou T; Shen N; Yang L; Abe N; Horton J; Mann RS; Bussemaker HJ; Gordân R; Rohs R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(15):4654-9. PubMed ID: 25775564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Theoretical and empirical quality assessment of transcription factor-binding motifs.
Medina-Rivera A; Abreu-Goodger C; Thomas-Chollier M; Salgado H; Collado-Vides J; van Helden J
Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Feb; 39(3):808-24. PubMed ID: 20923783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LASAGNA: a novel algorithm for transcription factor binding site alignment.
Lee C; Huang CH
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():108. PubMed ID: 23522376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MixChIP: a probabilistic method for cell type specific protein-DNA binding analysis.
Rautio S; Lähdesmäki H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 16():413. PubMed ID: 26703974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequence features of DNA binding sites reveal structural class of associated transcription factor.
Narlikar L; Hartemink AJ
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16267080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonconsensus Protein Binding to Repetitive DNA Sequence Elements Significantly Affects Eukaryotic Genomes.
Afek A; Cohen H; Barber-Zucker S; Gordân R; Lukatsky DB
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004429. PubMed ID: 26285121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. T-KDE: a method for genome-wide identification of constitutive protein binding sites from multiple ChIP-seq data sets.
Li Y; Umbach DM; Li L
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():27. PubMed ID: 24428924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated assessment and prediction of transcription factor binding.
Beyer A; Workman C; Hollunder J; Radke D; Möller U; Wilhelm T; Ideker T
PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Jun; 2(6):e70. PubMed ID: 16789814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA Shape Features Improve Transcription Factor Binding Site Predictions In Vivo.
Mathelier A; Xin B; Chiu TP; Yang L; Rohs R; Wasserman WW
Cell Syst; 2016 Sep; 3(3):278-286.e4. PubMed ID: 27546793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
