These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18726124)

  • 1. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods.
    Dimar JR; Carreon LY; Labelle H; Djurasovic M; Weidenbaum M; Brown C; Roussouly P
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Oct; 17(10):1373-9. PubMed ID: 18726124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters.
    Lafage R; Ferrero E; Henry JK; Challier V; Diebo B; Liabaud B; Lafage V; Schwab F
    Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2493-502. PubMed ID: 26343243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the Cobb angle and assessing sagittal plane by computer-assisted and manual measurement tools.
    Wu W; Liang J; Du Y; Tan X; Xiang X; Wang W; Ru N; Le J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Feb; 15():33. PubMed ID: 24502397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of a smartphone protractor to measure sagittal parameters in adult spinal deformity.
    Kunkle WA; Madden M; Potts S; Fogelson J; Hershman S
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1559-1564. PubMed ID: 28818564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of prone intraoperative measurements of global spinal alignment.
    Vaynrub M; Hirsch BP; Tishelman J; Vasquez-Montes D; Buckland AJ; Errico TJ; Protopsaltis TS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Aug; 29(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 29775162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further analysis of the reliability of the posterior tangent lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure: concurrent validity of computer-aided X-ray digitization.
    Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Holland B; Janik TJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Sep; 21(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 9777546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.
    Kuklo TR; Potter BK; O'Brien MF; Schroeder TM; Lenke LG; Polly DW;
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Apr; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 15800433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.
    Ames CP; Smith JS; Eastlack R; Blaskiewicz DJ; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Bess S; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Gupta M; O'Brien M; Hostin R; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis TS; Fu KM; Hart R; Albert TJ; Riew KD; Fehlings MG; Deviren V; Lafage V;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):673-83. PubMed ID: 26273762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance].
    Rillardon L; Levassor N; Guigui P; Wodecki P; Cardinne L; Templier A; Skalli W
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 May; 89(3):218-27. PubMed ID: 12844045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability Analysis of Spino-Pelvic Parameters in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comparison of Whole Spine and Pelvic Radiographs.
    Chen RQ; Hosogane N; Watanabe K; Funao H; Okada E; Fujita N; Hikata T; Iwanami A; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Abe T; Toyama Y; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Feb; 41(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 26579961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Vertebral Curves Using the Manual Post-It Technique.
    Gladnick BP; Schreiber JJ; Ishmael CR; Bjerke-Kroll BT; Cunningham ME
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Apr; 30(3):E148-E151. PubMed ID: 28323693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dedicated Spine Measurement Software Quantifies Key Spino-Pelvic Parameters More Reliably Than Traditional Picture Archiving and Communication Systems Tools.
    Gupta M; Henry JK; Schwab F; Klineberg E; Smith JS; Gum J; Polly DW; Liabaud B; Diebo BG; Hamilton DK; Eastlack R; Passias PG; Burton D; Protopsaltis T; Lafage V;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(1):E22-7. PubMed ID: 26571173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Sagittal Balance of the Spine--Clinical Importance and Radiographic Assessment].
    Decker S; Müller CW; Omar M; Krettek C; Schwab F; Trobisch PD
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Apr; 154(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 26670303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Schroeder TM; O'Brien MF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(11):1240-6. PubMed ID: 16688038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra and inter-observer reliability of determining degree of pelvic incidence in high-grade spondylolisthesis using a computer assisted method.
    Vialle R; Ilharreborde B; Dauzac C; Guigui P
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1449-53. PubMed ID: 16596420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
    De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of computer-assisted lumbar intervertebral measurements using a novel vertebral motion analysis system.
    Yeager MS; Cook DJ; Cheng BC
    Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 24239805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Video raster stereography back shape reconstruction: a reliability study for sagittal, frontal, and transversal plane parameters.
    Schroeder J; Reer R; Braumann KM
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Feb; 24(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 25424686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relevance of Cobb method in progressing sagittal plane spinal deformity.
    Harwant S
    Med J Malaysia; 2001 Dec; 56 Suppl D():48-53. PubMed ID: 14569767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.