111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18726772)
1. Genetic testing for vulnerable populations: what kinds of communication we need and do not need.
Schillinger D; Dohan D
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 18726772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct to confusion: lessons learned from marketing BRCA testing.
Matloff E; Caplan A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):5-8. PubMed ID: 18726769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DTC marketing of genetic tests: the perfect storm.
Chapman A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 18726771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why John Stuart Mill would support restriction on DTC marketing of genetic tests.
McGregor JL
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 18726770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Consumer alert: ethical issues raised by the sale of genetic tests directly to consumers.
Wasson K
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 18726774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DTC genetic services: a look across the pond.
Borry P; Howard H
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 18726773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Advertising genetic testing for breast cancer.
Weber LJ; Bissell MG
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2004; 18(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 14968755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using lessons learned from BRCA testing and marketing: what lies ahead for whole genome scanning services.
McGowan ML; Fishman JR
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 18726775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. FDA to regulate direct-to-consumer genetic tests.
Brower V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Nov; 102(21):1610-2, 1617. PubMed ID: 20966430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Actor-network theory: a tool to support ethical analysis of commercial genetic testing.
Williams-Jones B; Graham JE
New Genet Soc; 2003 Dec; 22(3):271-96. PubMed ID: 15115034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Private genetic testing in Canada: a summary.
Williams-Jones B
Health Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):10-3. PubMed ID: 15706712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Redefining a technology: public and private genetic testing in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Scott A; Du Plessis R
Sociol Health Illn; 2008 Apr; 30(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 18194355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics of development assistance for health.
Ruger JP
Hastings Cent Rep; 2015; 45(3):23-6. PubMed ID: 25944205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying?
Howard HC; Borry P
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):11-3. PubMed ID: 19998102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: should a more robust informed consent process be included?
Wasson K
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):56-8. PubMed ID: 19998119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Creating conditions for greater private sector participation in achieving contraceptive security.
Sharma S; Dayaratna V
Health Policy; 2005 Mar; 71(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 15694501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct-to-consumer marketing for genetic testing.
Theology and Ethics Department, Catholic Health Association
Health Prog; 2003; 84(5):35-6, 50. PubMed ID: 14513756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Response to open peer commentaries on "Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer personal genomics".
Lee SS; Crawley L
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):W1-3. PubMed ID: 19998097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genes on the Web--direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing.
Wolfberg AJ
N Engl J Med; 2006 Aug; 355(6):543-5. PubMed ID: 16899772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct-to-consumer genome-wide scans: astrologicogenomics or simple scams?
Hall W; Gartner C
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):54-6. PubMed ID: 19998118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
