62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1872688)
1. [Morphometric features of breast cancer cells in the evaluation of the degree of tumor differentiation].
Sil'chenko SA; Loboda VI; Isakova LM
Arkh Patol; 1991; 53(4):25-8. PubMed ID: 1872688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Objective cytological criteria in assessing the degree of the differentiation of breast cancer cells].
Sil'chenko SA; Loboda VI
Vopr Onkol; 1991; 37(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 2031329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuclear cytometric changes in breast carcinogenesis.
Mommers EC; Poulin N; Sangulin J; Meijer CJ; Baak JP; van Diest PJ
J Pathol; 2001 Jan; 193(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11169513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ and in situ component of ductal invasive carcinoma of the breast. A preliminary morphometric study.
Giardina C; Serio G; Lepore G; Lettini T; Dalena AM; Pennella A; D'Eredità G; Valente T; Ricco R
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2003 Jun; 22(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 12866579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of nuclear morphometry of breast cancer in histological sections with clinicopathological features and prognosis.
Abdalla F; Boder J; Markus R; Hashmi H; Buhmeida A; Collan Y
Anticancer Res; 2009 May; 29(5):1771-6. PubMed ID: 19443402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective nuclear grading for node-negative breast cancer patients: comparison of quasi-3D and 2D image-analysis based on light microscopic images.
Albert R; Müller JG; Kristen P; Harms H
Lab Invest; 1998 Mar; 78(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 9520938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Nuclear morphometric and cytophotometric studies of breast cancer. Comparison of the cytophotometric study results with the histological grading].
Mikuz G; Dietze O
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1982 Jul; 94(14):368-70. PubMed ID: 7147977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical analysis of labelling patterns of mammary carcinoma cell nuclei on histological sections.
Mattfeldt T; Eckel S; Fleischer F; Schmidt V
J Microsc; 2009 Jul; 235(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 19566632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Correlations between steroid receptors and the histopathologic differentiation of carcinoma of the breast in women].
Dizerens P; Anani P; Gómez F; De Grandi P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1985; 14(7):843-59. PubMed ID: 4093550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minichromosome maintenance protein 2 is a reliable proliferative marker in breast carcinoma.
Reena RM; Mastura M; Siti-Aishah MA; Munirah MA; Norlia A; Naqiyah I; Rohaizak M; Sharifah NA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Oct; 12(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 18774496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphometric analysis of differentiation in human breast carcinoma. Tumor heterogeneity.
Sharkey FE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1983 Aug; 107(8):411-4. PubMed ID: 6307212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Morphometric analysis of nuclear variations in normal and neoplastic mammary ductal cells].
Parada D; Farías RM; García-Tamayo J
Invest Clin; 1999 Dec; 40(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10666950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphometry of isolated tumor cells in breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes: metastases or displacement?
van Deurzen CH; Bult P; de Boer M; Koelemij R; van Hillegersberg R; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Hobbelink MG; de Bruin PC; van Diest PJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 18852675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic findings of bronchial brush cytology for pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: comparison with poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, and small cell carcinomas.
Kakinuma H; Mikami T; Iwabuchi K; Yokoyama M; Hattori M; Ohno E; Kuramoto H; Jiang SX; Okayasu I
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 12925987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nuclear morphology in breast cancer: is pleomorphism an illusion?
Huang J; Bay BH; Tan PH
Med Hypotheses; 2000 Jul; 55(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 11021321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cytometry and the degree of differentiation of squamous-cell lung cancer].
Bolgova LS
Klin Lab Diagn; 1993; (5):34-7. PubMed ID: 7994541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nuclear grading of breast carcinoma by image analysis. Classification by multivariate and neural network analysis.
Dawson AE; Austin RE; Weinberg DS
Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Apr; 95(4 Suppl 1):S29-37. PubMed ID: 2008882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of nuclear morphometry with pathologic parameters in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Tan PH; Goh BB; Chiang G; Bay BH
Mod Pathol; 2001 Oct; 14(10):937-41. PubMed ID: 11598161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loss of B-cell translocation gene-2 in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinoma is associated with tumor grade and overexpression of cyclin d1 protein.
Kawakubo H; Brachtel E; Hayashida T; Yeo G; Kish J; Muzikansky A; Walden PD; Maheswaran S
Cancer Res; 2006 Jul; 66(14):7075-82. PubMed ID: 16849553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nuclear morphometry as a predictor of disease outcome in gastric cancer.
Setälä L; Lipponen P; Kosma VM; Marin S; Eskelinen M; Syrjänen K; Alhava E
J Pathol; 1997 Jan; 181(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 9072002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
