165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18727165)
1. Minimising the effects of bolus dispersion in bolus-tracking MRI.
Willats L; Connelly A; Calamante F
NMR Biomed; 2008 Nov; 21(10):1126-37. PubMed ID: 18727165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correcting the effects of background microcirculation in the measurement of arterial input functions using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI of the brain.
Thornton RJ; Jones JY; Wang ZJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):619-23. PubMed ID: 16735184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Voxel-specific brain arterial input functions from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI and blind deconvolution in a group of healthy males.
Nordli H; Taxt T; Moen G; Grüner R
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):334-43. PubMed ID: 20192895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions.
Lorenz C; Benner T; Chen PJ; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Menezes NM; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 16969793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bolus dispersion issues related to the quantification of perfusion MRI data.
Calamante F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):718-22. PubMed ID: 16261569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bolus delay and dispersion in perfusion MRI: implications for tissue predictor models in stroke.
Calamante F; Willats L; Gadian DG; Connelly A
Magn Reson Med; 2006 May; 55(5):1180-5. PubMed ID: 16598717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.
Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2005 Mar; 25(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 15674238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deconvolution of bolus-tracking data: a comparison of discretization methods.
Sourbron S; Luypaert R; Morhard D; Seelos K; Reiser M; Peller M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(22):6761-78. PubMed ID: 17975296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI.
Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculation of cerebral perfusion parameters using regional arterial input functions identified by factor analysis.
Knutsson L; Larsson EM; Thilmann O; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):444-53. PubMed ID: 16523467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion.
Ko L; Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):639-43. PubMed ID: 17326085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: requirements and signal options.
Conturo TE; Akbudak E; Kotys MS; Chen ML; Chun SJ; Hsu RM; Sweeney CC; Markham J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 16261571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study.
Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perfusion precision in bolus-tracking MRI: estimation using the wild-bootstrap method.
Calamante F; Connelly A
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Mar; 61(3):696-704. PubMed ID: 19097234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scan-rescan variability in perfusion assessment of tumors in MRI using both model and data-derived arterial input functions.
Ashton E; Raunig D; Ng C; Kelcz F; McShane T; Evelhoch J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 18777526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review.
Calamante F
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2013 Oct; 74():1-32. PubMed ID: 24083460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
