165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18727165)
21. Dual-bolus approach to quantitative measurement of pulmonary perfusion by contrast-enhanced MRI.
Risse F; Semmler W; Kauczor HU; Fink C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1284-90. PubMed ID: 17051533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cerebral blood flow estimation in vivo using local tissue reference functions.
Kosior JC; Smith MR; Kosior RK; Frayne R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 19097104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative contrast-enhanced perfusion measurements of the human lung using the prebolus approach.
Oechsner M; Mühlhäusler M; Ritter CO; Weininger M; Beissert M; Jakob PM; Beer M; Hahn D; Köstler H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 19557852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perfusion parameters derived from bolus-tracking perfusion imaging are immune to tracer recirculation.
Kosior JC; Frayne R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):753-6. PubMed ID: 20187222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. T2* effects in the dual-sequence method for high-dose first-pass myocardial perfusion.
Gatehouse P; Lyne J; Smith G; Pennell D; Firmin D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1168-71. PubMed ID: 17031839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multi-stage automated local arterial input function selection in perfusion MRI.
Tabbara R; Connelly A; Calamante F
MAGMA; 2020 Jun; 33(3):357-365. PubMed ID: 31722036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improved deconvolution of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus delay and dispersion.
Willats L; Connelly A; Calamante F
Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jul; 56(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 16767744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimal location for arterial input function measurements near the middle cerebral artery in first-pass perfusion MRI.
Bleeker EJ; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2009 Apr; 29(4):840-52. PubMed ID: 19142193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bayesian estimation of cerebral perfusion using a physiological model of microvasculature.
Mouridsen K; Friston K; Hjort N; Gyldensted L; Østergaard L; Kiebel S
Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):570-9. PubMed ID: 16971140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modeling and correction of bolus dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Mehndiratta A; Calamante F; MacIntosh BJ; Crane DE; Payne SJ; Chappell MA
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1762-74. PubMed ID: 24453108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nonlinear DeltaR*2 effects in perfusion quantification using bolus-tracking MRI.
Calamante F; Connelly A; van Osch MJ
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Feb; 61(2):486-92. PubMed ID: 19161169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Single-channel blind estimation of arterial input function and tissue impulse response in DCE-MRI.
Taxt T; Jirík R; Rygh CB; Grüner R; Bartos M; Andersen E; Curry FR; Reed RK
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22217906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking.
Østergaard L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 16261573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Wavelet-based noise reduction for improved deconvolution of time-series data in dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI.
Wirestam R; Ståhlberg F
MAGMA; 2005 Jul; 18(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 15887036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation.
Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1266-75. PubMed ID: 17969061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain function.
Turner R
Am J Physiol Imaging; 1992; 7(3-4):136-45. PubMed ID: 1343210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis.
Calamante F; Mørup M; Hansen LK
Magn Reson Med; 2004 Oct; 52(4):789-97. PubMed ID: 15389944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A control point interpolation method for the non-parametric quantification of cerebral haemodynamics from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Mehndiratta A; MacIntosh BJ; Crane DE; Payne SJ; Chappell MA
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():560-70. PubMed ID: 22975158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nonlinear stochastic regularization to characterize tissue residue function in bolus-tracking MRI: assessment and comparison with SVD, block-circulant SVD, and Tikhonov.
Zanderigo F; Bertoldo A; Pillonetto G; Cobelli Ast C
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1287-97. PubMed ID: 19188118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. PerfTool: a software platform for investigating bolus-tracking perfusion imaging quantification strategies.
Kosior JC; Frayne R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):653-9. PubMed ID: 17326077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
