109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18729602)
1. Issues with the SIMPLE model: comment on Brown, Neath, and Chater (2007).
Murdock B
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jul; 115(3):779-80; discussion 781-5. PubMed ID: 18729602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociating conditional recency in immediate and delayed free recall: a challenge for unitary models of recency.
Farrell S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):324-47. PubMed ID: 20192534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word length and phonological similarity effects in simple, complex, and delayed serial recall tasks: implications for working memory.
Tehan G; Hendry L; Kocinski D
Memory; 2001; 9(4-6):333-48. PubMed ID: 11594356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correcting the SIMPLE model of free recall.
Lee MD; Pooley JP
Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):293-6. PubMed ID: 23356782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?
Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jul; 115(3):544-76. PubMed ID: 18729591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serial position curves in free recall.
Laming D
Psychol Rev; 2010 Jan; 117(1):93-133. PubMed ID: 20063965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Word length and phonological similarity effects in simple, complex, and delayed serial recall tasks: Implications for working memory.
Tehan G; Hendry L; Kocinski D
Memory; 2001 Jul; 9(4):333-348. PubMed ID: 11747587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pauses and durations exhibit a serial position effect.
Haberlandt K; Lawrence H; Krohn T; Bower K; Thomas JG
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 15945208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From brief gaps to very long pauses: temporal isolation does not benefit serial recall.
Nimmo LM; Lewandowsky S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Dec; 12(6):999-1004. PubMed ID: 16615319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.
Chow M; Macnamara BN; Conway AR
Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):937-49. PubMed ID: 27048510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The phonological loop unmasked? A comment on the evidence for a "perceptual-gestural" alternative.
Baddeley AD; Larsen JD
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Apr; 60(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 17455059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Memory retrieval tasks determine the serial position curves of linear orders with categorical structures.
Jou J
Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(4):525-65. PubMed ID: 16402745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is compound chaining the serial-order mechanism of spelling? A simple recurrent network investigation.
Goldberg AM; Rapp B
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Mar; 25(2):218-55. PubMed ID: 18568817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory.
Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K; Brown GD
Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Mar; 13(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 19223224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure to recall.
Laming D
Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):157-86. PubMed ID: 19159152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).
Baddeley AD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):544-9. PubMed ID: 11082863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.
Gupta P; Lipinski J; Aktunc E
Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1001-16. PubMed ID: 16496721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time scale similarity and long-term memory for autobiographical events.
Moreton BJ; Ward G
Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 20702870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: different paradigms answer different questions. A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer.
Service E
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):661-5. PubMed ID: 10994223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
