These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18729652)

  • 21. Sparse representations for the cocktail party problem.
    Asari H; Pearlmutter BA; Zador AM
    J Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 26(28):7477-90. PubMed ID: 16837596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A cocktail party with a cortical twist: how cortical mechanisms contribute to sound segregation.
    Elhilali M; Shamma SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3751-71. PubMed ID: 19206802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inharmonic speech reveals the role of harmonicity in the cocktail party problem.
    Popham S; Boebinger D; Ellis DPW; Kawahara H; McDermott JH
    Nat Commun; 2018 May; 9(1):2122. PubMed ID: 29844313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiological correlates of cocktail-party listening.
    Lewald J; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 292():157-66. PubMed ID: 26092714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Negative emotions in the target speaker's voice enhance speech recognition under "cocktail-party" environments.
    Lu L; Ding Y; Xue C; Li L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):247-259. PubMed ID: 33078380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Detection-Theoretic Analysis of Auditory Streaming and Its Relation to Auditory Masking.
    Chang AC; Lutfi R; Lee J; Heo I
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27641681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotionally conditioning the target-speech voice enhances recognition of the target speech under "cocktail-party" listening conditions.
    Lu L; Bao X; Chen J; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):871-883. PubMed ID: 29473143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
    Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech.
    Bronkhorst AW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1465-87. PubMed ID: 25828463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Kidd G; Patel AD
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11628. PubMed ID: 26112910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cortical Transformation of Spatial Processing for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem: A Computational Model(1,2,3).
    Dong J; Colburn HS; Sen K
    eNeuro; 2016; 3(1):. PubMed ID: 26866056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inherent Directionality Determines Spatial Release from Masking at the Tympanum in a Vertebrate with Internally Coupled Ears.
    Caldwell MS; Lee N; Bee MA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 27125545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech perception in noise: Masking and unmasking.
    Wang X; Xu L
    J Otol; 2021 Apr; 16(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 33777124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: Signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise.
    Vélez A; Bee MA
    Anim Behav; 2011 Dec; 82(6):1319-1327. PubMed ID: 22389519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech signal enhancement in cocktail party scenarios by deep learning based virtual sensing of head-mounted microphones.
    Fischer T; Caversaccio M; Wimmer W
    Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 408():108294. PubMed ID: 34182232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temporal and Directional Cue Effects on the Cocktail Party Problem for Patients With Listening Difficulties Without Clinical Hearing Loss.
    Kawase T; Teraoka R; Obuchi C; Sakamoto S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1740-1751. PubMed ID: 35671083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Genetic contribution to solving the cocktail-party problem.
    Mathias SR; Knowles EEM; Mollon J; Rodrigue AL; Woolsey MK; Hernandez AM; Garrett AS; Fox PT; Olvera RL; Peralta JM; Kumar S; Göring HHH; Duggirala R; Curran JE; Blangero J; Glahn DC
    iScience; 2022 Sep; 25(9):104997. PubMed ID: 36111257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Swinging at a cocktail party: voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice.
    Johnsrude IS; Mackey A; Hakyemez H; Alexander E; Trang HP; Carlyon RP
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1995-2004. PubMed ID: 23985575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.