240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18729701)
1. Innovation credit: when can leaders oppose their group's norms?
Abrams D; de Moura GR; Marques JM; Hutchison P
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):662-78. PubMed ID: 18729701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seeking conversion versus advocating tolerance in the pursuit of social change.
Prislin R; Filson J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):811-22. PubMed ID: 19857003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A double standard when group members behave badly: transgression credit to ingroup leaders.
Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G; Travaglino GA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):799-815. PubMed ID: 23895265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of decision making and group norms.
Postmes T; Spears R; Cihangir S
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jun; 80(6):918-30. PubMed ID: 11414374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: the moderating role of leader prototypicality.
De Cremer D; van Dijke M; Mayer DM
J Appl Psychol; 2010 Nov; 95(6):1121-33. PubMed ID: 20804231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not.
Ullrich J; Christ O; van Dick R
J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):235-44. PubMed ID: 19186908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of previous leaders on the evaluation of new leaders: an alternative to prototype matching.
Ritter BA; Lord RG
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1683-95. PubMed ID: 18020805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some aspects of influence and acceptability for appointed and elected group leaders.
Hollander EP; Fallon BJ; Edwards MT
J Psychol; 1977 Mar; 95(2d Half):289-96. PubMed ID: 845837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When are transgressing leaders punitively judged? An empirical test.
Shapiro DL; Boss AD; Salas S; Tangirala S; Von Glinow MA
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Mar; 96(2):412-22. PubMed ID: 21133529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The mainstream is not electable: when vision triumphs over representativeness in leader emergence and effectiveness.
Halevy N; Berson Y; Galinsky AD
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 37(7):893-904. PubMed ID: 21467538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: high social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers.
Son Hing LS; Bobocel DR; Zanna MP; McBride MV
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jan; 92(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17201543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change.
Valente TW; Pumpuang P
Health Educ Behav; 2007 Dec; 34(6):881-96. PubMed ID: 17602096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Social norms and identity relevance: a motivational approach to normative behavior.
Christensen PN; Rothgerber H; Wood W; Matz DC
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1295-309. PubMed ID: 15466602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance.
Galinsky AD; Magee JC; Gruenfeld DH; Whitson JA; Liljenquist KA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 95(6):1450-66. PubMed ID: 19025295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Older but wilier: In-group accountability and the development of subjective group dynamics.
Abrams D; Rutland A; Cameron L; Ferrell J
Dev Psychol; 2007 Jan; 43(1):134-48. PubMed ID: 17201514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social likeability, conformity, and body talk: Does fat talk have a normative rival in female body image conversations?
Tompkins KB; Martz DM; Rocheleau CA; Bazzini DG
Body Image; 2009 Sep; 6(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 19674946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Team-oriented leadership: the interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification.
Giessner SR; van Knippenberg D; van Ginkel W; Sleebos E
J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jul; 98(4):658-67. PubMed ID: 23565892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The paradox of group-based guilt: modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations.
Roccas S; Klar Y; Liviatan I
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):698-711. PubMed ID: 17014294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Communicating group norms through election results.
Syfers L; Gaffney AM; Rast DE; Estrada DA
Br J Soc Psychol; 2022 Jan; 61(1):300-321. PubMed ID: 34258766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity.
Klucharev V; Hytönen K; Rijpkema M; Smidts A; Fernández G
Neuron; 2009 Jan; 61(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 19146819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
