These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1873541)

  • 1. Establishing proper anatomy in Class II posterior restorations.
    Chalifoux PR
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1991; 3(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 1873541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of occlusion on the degradation of posterior composite resins.
    Leinfelder KF; Small B
    Dent Today; 1998 Nov; 17(11):44-50. PubMed ID: 10752417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Can current composites be used for Class I and II restorations in posterior teeth?].
    Baldensperger R
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985; 14(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 3866285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The composite resin-amalgam window preparation.
    Nelson JA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 4(6):21-6. PubMed ID: 1391930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique.
    Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Preparation-filling of the molar--can amalgam replace composite resins?].
    Shikai Tenbo; 1982 Apr; 59(4):682-95. PubMed ID: 6954654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing approximal contacts in Class 2 composite resin restorations.
    Doukoudakis S
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):182-4. PubMed ID: 9484169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practical procedures No 11. Simplified finishing procedures for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Freedman G
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 17(2):3 p preceding 137. PubMed ID: 15918308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior direct restorations: innovative materials and procedures for aesthetic success.
    Poss S
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004; 16(10):743-5. PubMed ID: 15739914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A modified technique for direct Class II posterior composite restorations.
    Blatz MB; Atlas A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006; 18(10):624. PubMed ID: 17283691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Esthetic and functional Class I and II restorations in the posterior teeth].
    Conz A; Fusetti F
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1985; 4(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 3869589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Use of composite resins for repairing molars, with special reference to their differences from amalgam].
    Hosoda H; Takatsu T
    DE J Dent Eng; 1983; (65):1-15. PubMed ID: 6409511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school.
    Ottenga ME; Mjör I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 17910231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The elusive tight contact with composite restorations. How to achieve it.
    Karst LE
    Dent Today; 2003 Nov; 22(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 14650341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expediting Class II posterior composite placement.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2001 Oct; 20(10):96-8, 100-1. PubMed ID: 11665424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
    Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.