These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1873566)

  • 1. Estimating the sensitivity of breast cancer screening--experience with the Honolulu BCDDP data.
    Grove JS; Goodman MJ; Gilbert FI; Low G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1991 May; 18 Suppl 1():S97-101. PubMed ID: 1873566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
    Seidman H; Gelb SK; Silverberg E; LaVerda N; Lubera JA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1987; 37(5):258-90. PubMed ID: 3115506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mammography].
    Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Highlights of the evidence of benefit for women aged 40-49 years from the 14-year follow-up of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
    Smart CR
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):296-300. PubMed ID: 8004600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ROC analysis of mammography and palpation for breast screening.
    Gohagan JK; Spitznagel EL; McCrate MM; Frank TB
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 6511268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Progress in screening for early breast cancer.
    Baker LH; Chin TD; Wagner KV
    J Surg Oncol; 1985 Oct; 30(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 4079432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan.
    Hou MF; Chuang HY; Ou-Yang F; Wang CY; Huang CL; Fan HM; Chuang CH; Wang JY; Hsieh JS; Liu GC; Huang TJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 28(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 12049952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An approach to estimating exposure-specific rates of breast cancer from a two-stage case-control study within a cohort.
    Benichou J; Byrne C; Gail M
    Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):133-51. PubMed ID: 9004388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival advantage differences by age. Evaluation of the extended follow-up of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.
    Byrne C; Smart CR; Chu KC; Hartmann WH
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):301-10. PubMed ID: 8004601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is clinical breast examination effective in Japan? Consideration from the age-specific performance of breast cancer screening combining mammography with clinical breast examination.
    Ohta K; Kasahara Y; Tanaka F; Maeda H
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Mar; 23(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 24925524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population.
    Schmitt EL; Threatt B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimated risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening for young BRCA mutation carriers.
    Berrington de Gonzalez A; Berg CD; Visvanathan K; Robson M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Feb; 101(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 19176458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer.
    Wu JC; Hakama M; Anttila A; Yen AM; Malila N; Sarkeala T; Auvinen A; Chiu SY; Chen HH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(2):553-66. PubMed ID: 20054645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
    Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography versus clinical examination of the breasts.
    Baines CJ; Miller AB
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):125-9. PubMed ID: 9709288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer?
    Fenton JJ; Barton MB; Geiger AM; Herrinton LJ; Rolnick SJ; Harris EL; Barlow WE; Reisch LM; Fletcher SW; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):67-71. PubMed ID: 16287888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.