These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1873659)

  • 1. A comparison between iotrolan, a non-ionic dimer, and a hyperosmolar contrast medium, Urografin, in hysterosalpingography.
    Brokensha C; Whitehouse G
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jul; 64(763):587-90. PubMed ID: 1873659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study: Endografine (diatrizoate), Vasurix polyvidone (acetrizoate), Dimer-X (iocarmate) and Hexabrix (ioxaglate) in hysterosalpingography.
    Schütte HE
    Diagn Imaging; 1982; 51(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 7173007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Experimental evaluation of iotrolan as an arthrographic contrast medium--knee arthrography with iotrolan in rabbits].
    Miyazawa T; Nakagawa H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Nov; 50(11):1381-6. PubMed ID: 2087397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of iotrolan versus ethiodized poppy-seed oil in hysterosalpingography.
    Lindequist S; Rasmussen F; Larsen C
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 8153331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hysterosalpingography using iotrolan--a new contrast medium].
    Jensen HJ; Dons-Jensen H; Kamal KM
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Sep; 3(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 8399416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison in myelography between iodixanol 270 and 320 mgI/ml and iotrolan 300 mgI/ml: a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, phase III trial.
    Palmers Y; Kuhn FP; Petersen D; De Greef D
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):686-91. PubMed ID: 11870488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Iotrolan-300 versus Iopamidol-300 in hysterosalpingography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Bauer M; Henne KW
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Sep; 1(5):256-8. PubMed ID: 1751562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Preclinical evaluation of iotrolan as a contrast medium for angiography and urography].
    Miyazawa T; Murayama C; Uchimoto R; Fritz-Zieroth B
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Sep; 52(9):1287-98. PubMed ID: 1437534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1095-7. PubMed ID: 8911157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hexabrix as a contrast agent for hysterosalpingography.
    Winfield AC; Maxson WS; Harding DR; Diggs J; Wentz AC
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):232-3. PubMed ID: 6729127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Iotrolan versus iopamidol. A controlled double-blind study with lumbar myelography].
    Maier B; Gerber U; König M; Stetter G
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):393-6. PubMed ID: 1410326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Knee arthrography: comparison of iotrolan and ioxaglate sodium meglumine.
    Obermann WR; Bloem JL; Hermans J
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 2781008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Padayachee TS; Reidy JF; King DH; Reeves M; Gosling RG
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 6822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic quality and complications of hysterosalpingography: oil- versus water-soluble contrast media--a randomized prospective study.
    Lindequist S; Justesen P; Larsen C; Rasmussen F
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 1848715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Omnipaque and urografin in arthrography of the knee.
    Farsø Nielsen F; de Carvalho A; Hjøllund Madsen E
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 6731021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic quality in hysterosalpingography. Comparison between iodixanol and iotrolan.
    Lindequist S; Rasmussen F; Madsen HH; Naeser A; Bjartveit K; Kristoffersen DT; Klaveness AJ
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Nov; 39(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 9817052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iopentol (Imagopaque 250) compared with diatrizoate (Urografin 219) in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). A clinical trial assessing safety (adverse events and S-pancreatic iso-amylase) and diagnostic information (VAS).
    Kruse A; Brock A; Rodenberg J; Nowakowska-Duawa E; Bjartveit K
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 4():S131-4. PubMed ID: 9204355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysterosalpingography with a new contrast medium.
    Wolf G; Fitzal P
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():190-4. PubMed ID: 2568792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.