These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper. Sim SM; Rasiah RI Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hand-scoring of multiple choice questions. Anderson J Med Educ; 1983 Mar; 17(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 6843390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A computer program to prepare and answer multiple choice questions. Worthley LI Anaesth Intensive Care; 1985 Nov; 13(4):417-9. PubMed ID: 3840959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The TUTOR, a software package for educational computing. Kobel M; Maitre PO; Schwander D Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1985; 2(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 3915011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms. Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options. Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy. Nnodim JO Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of e-Learning in a Medical School 2.0 Model: Comparison of Item Analysis for Student-Generated vs. Faculty-Generated Multiple-Choice Questions. Janzen BW; Sommerfeld C; Gooi ACC Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():184-188. PubMed ID: 30741193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The introduction of single best answer questions as a test of knowledge in the final examination for the fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology. Tan LT; McAleer JJ; Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Oct; 20(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 18585017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do item-writing flaws reduce examinations psychometric quality? Pais J; Silva A; Guimarães B; Povo A; Coelho E; Silva-Pereira F; Lourinho I; Ferreira MA; Severo M BMC Res Notes; 2016 Aug; 9(1):399. PubMed ID: 27516160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false? Pamphlett R Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing of medical students with open-ended, uncued questions. Damjanov I; Fenderson BA; Veloski JJ; Rubin E Hum Pathol; 1995 Apr; 26(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 7705813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input. Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors. Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions. Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items. Gierl MJ; Lai H; Turner SR Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):757-65. PubMed ID: 22803753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]