141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1874838)
1. The influence of linguistic context on young children's understanding of homophonic words.
Beveridge M; Marsh L
J Child Lang; 1991 Jun; 18(2):459-67. PubMed ID: 1874838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Token Frequency Effects in Homophone Production: An Elicitation Study.
Conwell E
Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):466-479. PubMed ID: 29096575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Possible explanations for children's literal interpretations of homonyms.
Mazzocco MM; Myers GF; Thompson LA; Desai SS
J Child Lang; 2003 Nov; 30(4):879-904. PubMed ID: 14686088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal input to children with specific language impairment during shared book reading: is mothers' language in tune with their children's production?
Majorano M; Lavelli M
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2014; 49(2):204-14. PubMed ID: 24224893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.
Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ; Jared D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):529-51. PubMed ID: 22905930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.
Miozzo M; Caramazza A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1360-71. PubMed ID: 16393051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The specific-word frequency effect in speech production: evidence from Spanish and French.
Cuetos F; Bonin P; Alameda JR; Caramazza A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):750-71. PubMed ID: 19728227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning homophones in context: Easy cases are favored in the lexicon of natural languages.
Dautriche I; Fibla L; Fievet AC; Christophe A
Cogn Psychol; 2018 Aug; 104():83-105. PubMed ID: 29778004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of linguistic context in deriving word meanings in individuals with Down Syndrome.
Roch M; Florit E; Levorato C
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Jan; 34(1):605-15. PubMed ID: 23123874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's interpretations of homonyms: a developmental study.
Mazzocco MM
J Child Lang; 1997 Jun; 24(2):441-67. PubMed ID: 9308427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Free associations and dominance ratings of homophones for young and older adults.
White KK; Abrams L
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Aug; 36(3):408-20. PubMed ID: 15641431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: does orthography matter?
Biedermann B; Nickels L
Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):683-97. PubMed ID: 18472038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning abstract words and concepts: insights from developmental language disorder.
Ponari M; Norbury CF; Rotaru A; Lenci A; Vigliocco G
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Aug; 373(1752):. PubMed ID: 29915008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of lexical expertise in reading homophones.
Burt JS; Jared D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1302-21. PubMed ID: 26158491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Homophone effects in visual word recognition depend on homophone type and task demands.
Kerswell L; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Sears CR; Owen WJ
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18266508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel-word learning deficits in Mandarin-speaking preschool children with specific language impairments.
Chen Y; Liu HM
Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jan; 35(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24211792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preschool children's use of cues to generic meaning.
Cimpian A; Markman EM
Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):19-53. PubMed ID: 17765216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiating scalar implicature from exclusion inferences in language acquisition.
Sullivan J; Davidson K; Wade S; Barner D
J Child Lang; 2019 Jul; 46(4):733-759. PubMed ID: 30967165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Putting singular and plural morphology in context*.
Dispaldro M; Benelli B
J Child Lang; 2012 Sep; 39(4):863-84. PubMed ID: 22261035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?
Pexman PM; Lupker SJ
Can J Exp Psychol; 1999 Dec; 53(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 10646204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
