These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18751506)

  • 1. Surgical backup for percutaneous coronary interventions: a question of principle or common sense?
    Seabra-Gomes R
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 27(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 18751506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why we should not do percutaneous coronary intervention at sites without surgical backup.
    Weaver WD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 May; 65(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 15816056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The current status and future direction of percutaneous coronary intervention without on-site surgical backup: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.
    Dehmer GJ; Blankenship J; Wharton TP; Seth A; Morrison DA; Dimario C; Muller D; Kellett M; Uretsky BF; ; ;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Mar; 69(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 17278155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence and rationale for percutaneous coronary intervention at qualified hospitals with off-site cardiac surgical backup.
    Wharton TP; Sinclair N
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 2003; 14(4):11-6. PubMed ID: 12918177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The top 100 cardiac programs. HCIA study shows midsized cities can hold their own when it comes to cardiac care.
    Morrissey J
    Mod Healthc; 1999 Mar; 29(11):28-9. PubMed ID: 10346364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on the outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis.
    Massoudy P; Thielmann M; Lehmann N; Marr A; Kleikamp G; Maleszka A; Zittermann A; Körfer R; Radu M; Krian A; Litmathe J; Gams E; Sezer O; Scheld H; Schiller W; Welz A; Dohmen G; Autschbach R; Slottosch I; Wahlers T; Neuhäuser M; Jöckel KH; Jakob H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Apr; 137(4):840-5. PubMed ID: 19327506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty hardware entrapment: guidewire entrapment.
    Capuano F; Simon C; Roscitano A; Sinatra R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Nov; 9(11):1140-1. PubMed ID: 18852589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Against coronary balloon dilatation in small hospitals].
    Zijlstra F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Nov; 151(46):2563. PubMed ID: 18074725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention crossing the threshold: time for a guidelines revision!
    Moses JW; Leon MB; Stone GW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Oct; 54(16):1512-4. PubMed ID: 19699047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Consideration--to whom? Percutaneous coronary intervention].
    Carstensen S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Jun; 168(24):2377. PubMed ID: 16822427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital redesign complements new PTCA pathway.
    King B
    Hosp Case Manag; 1996 Mar; 4(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 10156258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does higher surgical volume predict better patient outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Costich JF; Hill R; Slavova S
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2009 Jan; 107(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 19192511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ballooning without a parachute?
    Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(47):14-6. PubMed ID: 16334357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Secondary coronary revascularisation. A comprehensive approach to coronary revascularisation in patients with previous surgical or percutaneous interventions. Foreword.
    Escaned J; Macaya C; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2009 May; 5 Suppl D():D5. PubMed ID: 19736071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Surgical or interventional aortic valve repair? Pro interventional repair].
    Grube E; Buellesfeld L
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Oct; 133(40):2021. PubMed ID: 18819048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study.
    Burzotta F; Paloscia L; Trani C; Mascellanti M; Mongiardo R; Materazzo G; Niccoli G; Di Marco M; Leone AM; Porto I; Mazzari MA; Rebuzzi AG; Schiavoni G; Crea F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Oct; 9(10):1004-10. PubMed ID: 18799962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public reporting of quality measures what are we trying to accomplish?
    Califf RM; Peterson ED
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(10):831-3. PubMed ID: 19264237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining the length of stay following percutaneous coronary intervention: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
    Chambers CE; Dehmer GJ; Cox DA; Harrington RA; Babb JD; Popma JJ; Turco MA; Weiner BH; Tommaso CL;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jun; 73(7):847-58. PubMed ID: 19425053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Equity and variability in the use of medical technologies].
    Antoñanzas Villar F; Pinillos García M
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1217-20. PubMed ID: 17194415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased mortality and perioperative complications in patients with previous elective percutaneous coronary interventions undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Bonaros N; Hennerbichler D; Friedrich G; Kocher A; Pachinger O; Laufer G; Bonatti J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Apr; 137(4):846-52. PubMed ID: 19327507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.