These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18751535)

  • 1. Comparison of environmental effects and resource consumption for different wastewater and organic waste management systems in a new city area in Sweden.
    Hellström D; Baky A; Jeppsson U; Jönsson H; Kärrman E
    Water Environ Res; 2008 Aug; 80(8):708-18. PubMed ID: 18751535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exergy analysis of nutrient recovery processes.
    Hellström D
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 12926618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of food waste disposers on municipal waste and wastewater management.
    Marashlian N; El-Fadel M
    Waste Manag Res; 2005 Feb; 23(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 15751392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental impact analysis of chemicals and energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants: case study of Oslo, Norway.
    Venkatesh G; Brattebø H
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(5):1018-31. PubMed ID: 21411954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential for nutrient recovery and biogas production from blackwater, food waste and greywater in urban source control systems.
    Kjerstadius H; Haghighatafshar S; Davidsson Å
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(13-16):1707-20. PubMed ID: 25608932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lifecycle assessment of a system for food waste disposers to tank - A full-scale system evaluation.
    Bernstad Saraiva A; Davidsson Å; Bissmont M
    Waste Manag; 2016 Aug; 54():169-77. PubMed ID: 27184450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sustainability concept for a newly built urban area in Malmö, Sweden.
    Gruvberger C; Aspegren H; Andersson B; la Cour Jansen J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):33-9. PubMed ID: 12793659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of separate urine collection on wastewater treatment systems.
    Wilsenach J; van Loosdrecht M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 12926626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of sludge management parameters resulting from the use of domestic garbage disposers.
    Galil NI; Yaacov L
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(10):27-34. PubMed ID: 11794665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Municipal anaerobic digesters for codigestion, energy recovery, and greenhouse gas reductions.
    Zitomer DH; Adhikari P; Heisel C; Dineen D
    Water Environ Res; 2008 Mar; 80(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 18419011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the environmental impact of management measures for the biodegradable fraction of municipal solid waste in São Paulo City.
    Mendes MR; Aramaki T; Hanaki K
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 12893012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental impact of recycling nutrients in human excreta to agriculture compared with enhanced wastewater treatment.
    Spångberg J; Tidåker P; Jönsson H
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Sep; 493():209-19. PubMed ID: 24946033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Energy analysis of conventional and source-separation systems for urban wastewater management using Life Cycle Assessment.
    Remy C; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22173404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From waste treatment to integrated resource management.
    Wilsenach JA; Maurer M; Larsen TA; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12926615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separate collection of household food waste for anaerobic degradation - Comparison of different techniques from a systems perspective.
    Bernstad A; la Cour Jansen J
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):806-15. PubMed ID: 22321897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of costs for three hypothetical alternative kitchen waste management systems.
    Schiettecatte W; Tize R; De Wever H
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1094-102. PubMed ID: 25341873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digestion of sludge and organic waste in the sustainability concept for Malmö, Sweden.
    la Cour Jansen J; Gruvberger C; Hanner N; Aspegren H; Svärd A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(10):163-9. PubMed ID: 15259951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carbon footprint of urban source separation for nutrient recovery.
    Kjerstadius H; Bernstad Saraiva A; Spångberg J; Davidsson Å
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():250-257. PubMed ID: 28391098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Food waste-wastewater-energy/resource" nexus: Integrating food waste management with wastewater treatment towards urban sustainability.
    Zan F; Iqbal A; Lu X; Wu X; Chen G
    Water Res; 2022 Mar; 211():118089. PubMed ID: 35074573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Does Scale of Implementation Impact the Environmental Sustainability of Wastewater Treatment Integrated with Resource Recovery?
    Cornejo PK; Zhang Q; Mihelcic JR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(13):6680-9. PubMed ID: 27001077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.