305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18752085)
1. The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques.
Ottosson RO; Engstrom PE; Sjöström D; Behrens CF; Karlsson A; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 18752085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trade-off bounds for the Pareto surface approximation in multi-criteria IMRT planning.
Serna JI; Monz M; Küfer KH; Thieke C
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6299-311. PubMed ID: 19809122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RapidArc volumetric modulated therapy planning for prostate cancer patients.
Kjaer-Kristoffersen F; Ohlhues L; Medin J; Korreman S
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 18855157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of anatomy-based, fluence-based and aperture-based treatment planning approaches for VMAT.
Rao M; Cao D; Chen F; Ye J; Mehta V; Wong T; Shepard D
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(21):6475-90. PubMed ID: 20959688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An approach to multiobjective optimization of rotational therapy. II. Pareto optimal surfaces and linear combinations of modulated blocked arcs for a prostate geometry.
Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2606-16. PubMed ID: 20632572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the quality of conformal treatment planning: a new tool for quantitative comparison.
Menhel J; Levin D; Alezra D; Symon Z; Pfeffer R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5363-75. PubMed ID: 17019044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The equivalence of multi-criteria methods for radiotherapy plan optimization.
Breedveld S; Storchi PR; Heijmen BJ
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7199-209. PubMed ID: 19920305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introducing multiple treatment plan-based comparison to investigate the performance of gantry angle optimisation (GAO) in IMRT for head and neck cancer.
Thor M; Benedek H; Knöös T; Engström P; Behrens CF; Hauer AK; Sjöström D; Ceberg C
Acta Oncol; 2012 Jul; 51(6):743-51. PubMed ID: 22530922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A feasible application of constrained optimization in the IMRT system.
Artacho Terrer JM; Nasarre Benedé MA; Bernués del Rio E; Cruz Llanas S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar; 54(3):370-9. PubMed ID: 17355048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pareto fronts in clinical practice for pinnacle.
Janssen T; van Kesteren Z; Franssen G; Damen E; van Vliet C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):873-80. PubMed ID: 22901383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The dosimetric impact of leaf interdigitation and leaf width on VMAT treatment planning in Pinnacle: comparing Pareto fronts.
van Kesteren Z; Janssen TM; Damen E; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C
Phys Med Biol; 2012 May; 57(10):2943-52. PubMed ID: 22516969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.
Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On-line re-optimization of prostate IMRT plans for adaptive radiation therapy.
Wu QJ; Thongphiew D; Wang Z; Mathayomchan B; Chankong V; Yoo S; Lee WR; Yin FF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):673-91. PubMed ID: 18199909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pareto navigation: algorithmic foundation of interactive multi-criteria IMRT planning.
Monz M; Küfer KH; Bortfeld TR; Thieke C
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):985-98. PubMed ID: 18263953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
