148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18752086)
1. An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode.
Garcia-Ibanez L; Macias AR; Morera C; Rodriguez MM; Szyfter W; Skarszynski H; Emamdjomeh H; Baumgartner WD
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 129(6):651-64. PubMed ID: 18752086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cochlear function following implantation with a full electrode array.
Obholzer RJ; Gibson WP
Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21756458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422.
Jurawitz MC; Büchner A; Harpel T; Schüssler M; Majdani O; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(5):293-309. PubMed ID: 25277083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear implantation: is hearing preservation necessary in severe to profound hearing loss?
Derinsu U; Serin GM; Akdaş F; Batman Ç
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 21403538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why.
James C; Albegger K; Battmer R; Burdo S; Deggouj N; Deguine O; Dillier N; Gersdorff M; Laszig R; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Mondain M; Offeciers E; Macías AR; Ramsden R; Sterkers O; Von Wallenberg E; Weber B; Fraysse B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):481-91. PubMed ID: 16092537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing preservation after complete cochlear coverage in cochlear implantation with the free-fitting FLEXSOFT electrode carrier.
Helbig S; Baumann U; Hey C; Helbig M
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 21730882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.
James CJ; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Lenarz T; Mawman D; Ramos A; Ramsden R; Sterkers O
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 17063012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.
Nguyen Y; Mosnier I; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Ferrary E; Sterkers O
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 133(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 23216055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hearing preservation via a cochleostomy approach and deep insertion of a standard length cochlear implant electrode.
Bruce IA; Bates JE; Melling C; Mawman D; Green KM
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1444-7. PubMed ID: 22089957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Residual hearing preservation after pediatric cochlear implantation.
Brown RF; Hullar TE; Cadieux JH; Chole RA
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1221-6. PubMed ID: 20818293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of preservation of residual hearing using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation: can this implantation technique be used for preservation of residual hearing?
Postelmans JT; van Spronsen E; Grolman W; Stokroos RJ; Tange RA; Maré MJ; Dreschler WA
Laryngoscope; 2011 Aug; 121(8):1794-9. PubMed ID: 21792971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Residual hearing preservation after cochlear implantation via round window or cochleostomy approach.
Sun CH; Hsu CJ; Chen PR; Wu HP
Laryngoscope; 2015 Jul; 125(7):1715-9. PubMed ID: 25583631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deep insertion - round window approach by using SRA electrode.
Skarżyński H; Matusiak M; Furmanek M; Skarzyński PH
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S4-7. PubMed ID: 24869441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
