BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18752398)

  • 1. Response-selection conflict contributes to inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):991-9. PubMed ID: 18752398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the relationship between occipital cortex activity and inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 19572908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition.
    Donkers FC; van Boxtel GJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 15518933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return?
    Mayer AR; Seidenberg M; Dorflinger JM; Rao SM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1262-71. PubMed ID: 15453978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition of return: sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):908-19. PubMed ID: 16846287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural processes of attentional inhibition of return traced with magnetoencephalography.
    Ayabe T; Ishizu T; Kojima S; Urakawa T; Nishitani N; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R
    Neuroscience; 2008 Oct; 156(3):769-80. PubMed ID: 18762232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-induced emotion modulates processes of response inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Yu F; Yuan J; Luo YJ
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18978645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of successful and partial inhibitions in children: an ERP study.
    Cragg L; Fox A; Nation K; Reid C; Anderson M
    Dev Psychobiol; 2009 Nov; 51(7):533-43. PubMed ID: 19685486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of spatial validity-invalidity by the P300 component in children and young adults.
    Flores AB; Gómez CM; Meneres S
    Brain Res Bull; 2010 Apr; 81(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 20080154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation-related frontocentral negativity evoked by correct responses and errors.
    Suchan B; Jokisch D; Skotara N; Daum I
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 17688954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.