These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1875274)

  • 1. Getting started.
    Ballard AL
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1991; 7(4):202-4. PubMed ID: 1875274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Action research applied to a preceptorship program.
    Balcain A; Lendrum BL; Bowler P; Doucette J; Maskell M
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1997; 13(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 9287626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Models for evaluating nursing education programs.
    Herbener DJ; Watson JE
    Nurs Outlook; 1992; 40(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 1570220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs - a review and a strategy for follow up.
    Kjellgren KI; Welin C; Danielson E
    Nurse Educ Today; 2005 May; 25(4):316-25. PubMed ID: 15896417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The education connection: a staff development concept.
    Spalt SM; Moellering JA
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1989; 5(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 2732791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of return on investment of workplace education: an annotated list of references.
    Blake BE
    J Nurses Staff Dev; 2000; 16(6):289-92. PubMed ID: 11912822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation: an important aspect of staff development service.
    Jeska SB
    J Nurs Care Qual; 1994 Jul; 8(4):55-65. PubMed ID: 7919445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Innovative strategies for nursing education program evaluation.
    Story L; Butts JB; Bishop SB; Green L; Johnson K; Mattison H
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Jun; 49(6):351-4. PubMed ID: 20210284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Education for critical care nursing.
    Kinney MR
    Annu Rev Nurs Res; 1990; 8():161-76. PubMed ID: 2206624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suggestions for reviewing clinical continuing education courses.
    Cleary ML; Walter G
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2011 Mar; 42(3):105-6. PubMed ID: 21366197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Connecting the dots of evaluation.
    Desilets LD
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2009 Dec; 40(12):532-3. PubMed ID: 20000259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formative evaluation of a computer-assisted learning program in pharmacology for nursing students.
    Manias E; Bullock S; Bennett R
    Comput Nurs; 2000; 18(6):265-71. PubMed ID: 11105400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A program evaluation instrument.
    Henker R; Hinshaw AS
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1990; 6(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 2299403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Program evaluation: an ongoing systematic process.
    Gard CL; Flannigan PN; Cluskey M
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2004; 25(4):176-9. PubMed ID: 15387511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome studies.
    Brunt B
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1993; 9(2):96-7. PubMed ID: 8492187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing master's programs in oncology nursing.
    Brown J; Hinds P
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994 Aug; 21(7):1239-48. PubMed ID: 7971434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of learning and program effectiveness.
    Menix KD
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2007; 38(5):201-8; quiz 209-10. PubMed ID: 17907664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using structure, process, and outcome for total program evaluation in continuing nursing education.
    Stein AM
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1995; 11(6):322-4. PubMed ID: 8699270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The comparison of nursing competence pre- and postimplementing clinical ladder system.
    Hsu N; Chen BT; Lee LL; Chen CH; Lai CF
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Feb; 14(2):264-5. PubMed ID: 15669936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A rubric for improving the quality of online courses.
    Blood-Siegfried JE; Short NM; Rapp CG; Hill E; Talbert S; Skinner J; Campbell A; Goodwin L
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2008; 5():Article 34. PubMed ID: 18976231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.