131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1875369)
1. Comparative sensitivity of four Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) to five repellents.
Robert LL; Hallam JA; Seeley DC; Roberts LW; Wirtz RA
J Med Entomol; 1991 May; 28(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 1875369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory evaluation of repellents against four anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and two phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae).
Coleman RE; Robert LL; Roberts LW; Glass JA; Seeley DC; Laughinghouse A; Perkins PV; Wirtz RA
J Med Entomol; 1993 May; 30(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 8510108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relative efficacy of repellents against mosquito vectors of disease.
Curtis CF; Lines JD; Ijumba J; Callaghan A; Hill N; Karimzad MA
Med Vet Entomol; 1987 Apr; 1(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 2908762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deet and permethrin as protectants against malaria-infected and uninfected Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes.
Robert LL; Schneider I; Wirtz RA
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1991 Jun; 7(2):304-6. PubMed ID: 1895090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory evaluation of dimethyl phthalate against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens.
Khoobdel M; Oshaghi MA; Jonaidi N; Shayeghi M; Abaei MR; Panahi Y; Vatandoost H; Vatani H; Tajik A; Saeedfar H
Pak J Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 10(5):745-50. PubMed ID: 19069857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Studies on the inheritance of repellent tolerances in Aedes aegypti.
Rutledge LC; Gupta RK; Piper GN; Lowe CA
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1994 Mar; 10(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 8014634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory evaluation of 3 repellents against Anopheles stephensi in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Vatandoost H; Hanafi-Bojd AA
East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 18561716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as larvicides against the mosquitoes Aedes albopictus and Anopheles albimanus.
Xue RD; Barnard DR; Ali A
Med Vet Entomol; 2001 Dec; 15(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 11776456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response of Anopheles dirus and Aedes albopictus to repellents in the laboratory.
Frances SP; Eikarat N; Sripongsai B; Eamsila C
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1993 Dec; 9(4):474-6. PubMed ID: 8126487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevention of Lyme disease.
Couch P; Johnson CE
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 May; 49(5):1164-73. PubMed ID: 1595748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy assessment of Quwenling, a mosquito repellent from China.
Schreck CE; Leonhardt BA
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1991 Sep; 7(3):433-6. PubMed ID: 1791453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attraction of mosquitoes to diethyl methylbenzamide and ethyl hexanediol.
Mehr ZA; Rutledge LC; Buescher MD; Gupta RK; Zakaria MM
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1990 Sep; 6(3):469-76. PubMed ID: 2230775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of repellents Ocimum forskolei and deet on the response of Anopheles stephensi to host odours.
Waka M; Hopkins RJ; Glinwood R; Curtis C
Med Vet Entomol; 2006 Dec; 20(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 17199748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Synergy between repellents and non-pyrethroid insecticides strongly extends the efficacy of treated nets against Anopheles gambiae.
Pennetier C; Corbel V; Boko P; Odjo A; N'Guessan R; Lapied B; Hougard JM
Malar J; 2007 Mar; 6():38. PubMed ID: 17394646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insecticidal and Behavioral Avoidance Responses of Anopheles minimus and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Three Synthetic Repellents.
Boonyuan W; Sathantriphop S; Tainchum K; Muenworn V; Prabaripai A; Bangs MJ; Chareonviriyaphap T
J Med Entomol; 2017 Sep; 54(5):1312-1322. PubMed ID: 28419272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interactions of DEET and Novel Repellents With Mosquito Odorant Receptors.
Grant GG; Estrera RR; Pathak N; Hall CD; Tsikolia M; Linthicum KJ; Bernier UR; Hall AC
J Med Entomol; 2020 Jul; 57(4):1032-1040. PubMed ID: 32048720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative repellency of two formulations of N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and permethrin-treated clothing against Culex sitiens and Aedes vigilax in Thailand.
Harbach RE; Tang DB; Wirtz RA; Gingrich JB
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1990 Dec; 6(4):641-4. PubMed ID: 2098470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET, IR3535, and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes.
Costantini C; Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2004 Nov; 98(11):644-52. PubMed ID: 15363644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - a literature review.
Lupi E; Hatz C; Schlagenhauf P
Travel Med Infect Dis; 2013; 11(6):374-411. PubMed ID: 24201040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia.
Frances SP; Cooper RD; Sweeney AW
J Med Entomol; 1998 Sep; 35(5):690-3. PubMed ID: 9775594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
