These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18753758)

  • 1. In vivo intrauterine sound pressure and temperature measurements during magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 T) in pregnant ewes.
    Ruckhäberle E; Nekolla SG; Ganter C; Schneider KT; Peter A; Raidt A; Kovacs L; Brockmeier SJ; Schwaiger M; Oberhoffer R; Papadopulos NA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18753758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Obstetrical ultrasound: can the fetus hear the wave and feel the heat?].
    Abramowicz JS; Kremkau FW; Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 22700164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multicenter trial and comparison with other pulse sequences.
    Miyati T; Banno T; Fujita H; Mase M; Narita H; Imazawa M; Ohba S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Aug; 18(8):733-6. PubMed ID: 10534055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vibroacoustic stimulation and intrauterine sound pressure levels.
    Nyman M; Arulkumaran S; Hsu TS; Ratnam SS; Till O; Westgren M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):803-6. PubMed ID: 1923201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of abdominal vibroacoustic stimulation on sound and acceleration levels at the head of the fetal sheep.
    Abrams RM; Peters AJ; Gerhardt KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 9241296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound levels in the human uterus.
    Richards DS; Frentzen B; Gerhardt KJ; McCann ME; Abrams RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 1635729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrauterine sound levels: intrapartum assessment with an intrauterine microphone.
    Smith CV; Satt B; Phelan JP; Paul RH
    Am J Perinatol; 1990 Oct; 7(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 2222618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation test: vibrator response characteristics in pregnant sheep postmortem.
    Peters AJ; Abrams RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 8423945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus.
    De Wilde JP; Rivers AW; Price DL
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):335-53. PubMed ID: 15556670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging.
    Glover P; Hykin J; Gowland P; Wright J; Johnson I; Mansfield P
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Oct; 68(814):1090-4. PubMed ID: 7496710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise level and ultrasound spectra during burring.
    Sorainen E; Rytkönen E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 12271344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of sound measurement systems for auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nam EC; Kim SS; Lee KU; Kim SS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 26(5):715-20. PubMed ID: 18440748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of fetal exposure to external loud noise using a sheep model: quantification of in utero acoustic transmission across the human audio range.
    Gélat P; David AL; Haqhenas SR; Henriques J; Thibaut de Maisieres A; White T; Jauniaux E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):343.e1-343.e11. PubMed ID: 31152712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound environment of the fetal sheep.
    Gerhardt KJ; Abrams RM; Oliver CC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jan; 162(1):282-7. PubMed ID: 2301503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
    Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nordell A; Lundh M; Horsch S; Hallberg B; Aden U; Nordell B; Blennow M
    Acta Paediatr; 2009 Aug; 98(8):1278-83. PubMed ID: 19432831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrauterine noise levels produced in pregnant ewes by sound applied to the abdomen.
    Gerhardt KJ; Abrams RM; Kovaz BM; Gomez KJ; Conlon M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 159(1):228-32. PubMed ID: 3394740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite.
    Moelker A; Vogel MW; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 12541235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single point imaging with suppressed sound pressure levels through gradient-shape adjustment.
    Latta P; Gruwel ML; Edie E; Srámek M; Tomanek B
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Oct; 170(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 15388078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners.
    Kännälä S; Toivo T; Alanko T; Jokela K
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2243-57. PubMed ID: 19293469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.