135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18753965)
1. Immunohistochemical differences between mucinous and microglandular adenocarcinomas of the endometrium and benign endocervical epithelium.
Chekmareva M; Ellenson LH; Pirog EC
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Oct; 27(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 18753965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CD10 and calretinin staining of endocervical glandular lesions, endocervical stroma and endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: CD10 positivity is characteristic of, but not specific for, mesonephric lesions and is not specific for endometrial stroma.
McCluggage WG; Oliva E; Herrington CS; McBride H; Young RH
Histopathology; 2003 Aug; 43(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 12877729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of morphologic and immunohistochemical features of cervical microglandular hyperplasia with low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
Qiu W; Mittal K
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jul; 22(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 12819393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immunoprofile of endocervical and endometrial stromal cells and its potential application in localization of tumor involvement.
Barroeta JE; Pasha TL; Acs G; Zhang PJ
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2007 Jan; 26(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 17197901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microglandular adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a form of mucinous adenocarcinoma that may be confused with microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix.
Zaloudek C; Hayashi GM; Ryan IP; Powell CB; Miller TR
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1997 Jan; 16(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 8986533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PAX2 and cyclin D1 expression in the distinction between cervical microglandular hyperplasia and endometrial microglandular-like carcinoma: a comparison with p16, vimentin, and Ki67.
Stewart CJ; Crook ML
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2015 Jan; 34(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 25473758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endocervical adenocarcinomas with prominent endometrial or endomyometrial involvement simulating primary endometrial carcinomas: utility of HPV DNA detection and immunohistochemical expression of p16 and hormone receptors to confirm the cervical origin of the corpus tumor.
Yemelyanova A; Vang R; Seidman JD; Gravitt PE; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jun; 33(6):914-24. PubMed ID: 19295407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mitotically active microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix: a case series with implications for the differential diagnosis.
Abi-Raad R; Alomari A; Hui P; Buza N
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Sep; 33(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 25083971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mucinous endometrial epithelial proliferations: a morphologic spectrum of changes with diverse clinical significance.
Nucci MR; Prasad CJ; Crum CP; Mutter GL
Mod Pathol; 1999 Dec; 12(12):1137-42. PubMed ID: 10619266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. p16 immunoreactivity may assist in the distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma.
McCluggage WG; Jenkins D
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jul; 22(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 12819388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. p16 expression in primary ovarian mucinous and endometrioid tumors and metastatic adenocarcinomas in the ovary: utility for identification of metastatic HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinomas.
Vang R; Gown AM; Farinola M; Barry TS; Wheeler DT; Yemelyanova A; Seidman JD; Judson K; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 May; 31(5):653-63. PubMed ID: 17460447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic application of KRAS mutation testing in uterine microglandular proliferations.
Hong W; Abi-Raad R; Alomari AK; Hui P; Buza N
Hum Pathol; 2015 Jul; 46(7):1000-5. PubMed ID: 25997988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinguishing mucinous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium from benign endocervical epithelium.
Mittal K
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2009 Sep; 28(5):479. PubMed ID: 19696620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammaglobin expression in the female genital tract: immunohistochemical analysis in benign and neoplastic endocervix and endometrium.
Onuma K; Dabbs DJ; Bhargava R
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Jul; 27(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 18580321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A case of microglandular adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
Karateke A; Haliloglu B; Atay V; Gurbuz A; Kir G
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):778-81. PubMed ID: 16229880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mucinous epithelial lesions in endometrial curettage material: a diagnostic challenge.
Pavlakis K; Vrekoussis T; Messini I; Voulgaris Z; Chrysanthakis D; Yiannou P; Stofas A; Panoskaltsis T
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2012 Dec; 20(6):607-13. PubMed ID: 22531687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tissue-based Immunohistochemical Biomarker Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Lesions of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.
Lee S; Rose MS; Sahasrabuddhe VV; Zhao R; Duggan MA
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2017 Jul; 36(4):310-322. PubMed ID: 27801764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus: a rare and deceptively bland form of endometrial carcinoma.
Fujiwara M; Longacre TA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Apr; 35(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 21378544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [New cytogenetic classification of precancerous lesions and carcinomas of the endometrium: possibilities and limits of immunohistochemical differentiation].
Dallenbach-Hellweg G
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1991; 75():357-62. PubMed ID: 1724841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of p16 expression for distinction of uterine serous carcinomas from endometrial endometrioid and endocervical adenocarcinomas: immunohistochemical analysis of 201 cases.
Yemelyanova A; Ji H; Shih IeM; Wang TL; Wu LS; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Oct; 33(10):1504-14. PubMed ID: 19623034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
