These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18754213)

  • 1. Appeals to the Mental Health Review Tribunal in an ageing population.
    Deshpande N; Morton T; Haque S; Oyebode F
    Med Sci Law; 2008 Jul; 48(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 18754213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act?
    Bradley C; Marshall M; Gath D
    BMJ; 1995 Feb; 310(6976):364-7. PubMed ID: 7632216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in the Mental Health Act Review Tribunals: a Welsh experience 2004-2008.
    Aziz VM
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Oct; 16(7):375-7. PubMed ID: 19733323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Managers should review patients who do not appeal.
    Langley G
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196; author reply 1197. PubMed ID: 7767169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protecting the rights of detained patients.
    Barnes M
    Med Law; 1996; 15(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 9009596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Intellectually elite are more likely to appeal.
    O'Dwyer J; Whitton I
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196. PubMed ID: 7632237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethnicity as a predictor of detention under the Mental Health Act.
    Singh SP; Burns T; Tyrer P; Islam Z; Parsons H; Crawford MJ
    Psychol Med; 2014 Apr; 44(5):997-1004. PubMed ID: 23795603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appeals against detention in excessive security (outcomes of appeals against detention in conditions of excessive security in Scotland).
    Slater A; Bennett DM; Vojt G; Thomson L
    Med Sci Law; 2016 Jul; 56(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 26113543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethnicity and detention: are Black and minority ethnic (BME) groups disproportionately detained under the Mental Health Act 2007?
    Gajwani R; Parsons H; Birchwood M; Singh SP
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2016 May; 51(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 26886264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implications of a new case law on the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.
    Shah A
    Med Sci Law; 2010 Oct; 50(4):217-9. PubMed ID: 21539290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current appeal system for those detained in England and Wales under the Mental Health Act needs reform.
    Gosney P; Lomax P; Hooper C; O'Brien A
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Mar; 45(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 30514756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical review of patients under Section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act of 1983.
    Najim H; Shaik R
    Psychiatr Danub; 2013 Sep; 25 Suppl 2():S241-3. PubMed ID: 23995184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Rate of appeal may be higher elsewhere.
    Naik PC; Klenka L
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1195-6; author reply 1197. PubMed ID: 7767167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detention of potentially dangerous people.
    Lancet; 1998 Nov; 352(9141):1641. PubMed ID: 9853429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Low appeal rate may reflect trust in doctors' judgment.
    Burns T; Raphael F
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196. PubMed ID: 7767168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Mental Health Act and professional hostage taking.
    Mason T; Jennings L
    Med Sci Law; 1997 Jan; 37(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 9029923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A one year analysis of appeals made to mental health review tribunals in New Zealand.
    O'Brien TA; Mellsop GW; McDonald KP; Ruthe CB
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1995 Dec; 29(4):661-5. PubMed ID: 8825830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aspects of Mental Health Act 1990 in New South Wales Australia.
    Singh S
    Med Law; 1996; 15(3):441-6. PubMed ID: 9009595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Possible problem with section 12.
    Price JH
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1197. PubMed ID: 7767173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? New Zealand's system has much to offer.
    Turner TH
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196-7. PubMed ID: 7767170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.