333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18754309)
1. [Screening for colorectal cancer: definitely implement].
Jansen JB
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Aug; 152(32):1776. PubMed ID: 18754309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.
Markowitz AJ; Winawer SJ
Semin Oncol; 1999 Oct; 26(5):485-98. PubMed ID: 10528896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Colorectal cancer screening].
Loffeld RJ; van Bochov A
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Feb; 153(6):258-9; author reply 259. PubMed ID: 19271450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal cancer screening: health impact and cost effectiveness.
Maciosek MV; Solberg LI; Coffield AB; Edwards NM; Goodman MJ
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Jul; 31(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 16777546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Arguments against implementing a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer].
Bonneux L
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Aug; 152(32):1777. PubMed ID: 18754310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.
Inadomi JM
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 23 Suppl 2():S198-204. PubMed ID: 19120898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colorectal cancer detection and screening.
Gruber M; Lance P
Lippincotts Prim Care Pract; 1998; 2(4):369-76; quiz 377-8. PubMed ID: 9709082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is population screening for colorectal cancer cost-effective?
Pignone M
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):288-9. PubMed ID: 16265263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Colorectal cancer screening in an expanding panorama of screening programmes.
Hoff G
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 20833354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Colorectal cancer screening is profitable].
Pikkarainen P
Duodecim; 1999; 115(17):1813-4. PubMed ID: 11941648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Colorectal cancer: a risk-adapted screening and the role of the physician in the prevention of this cancer].
Chappuis PO; Hutter P
Rev Med Suisse; 2006 May; 2(66):1314, 1316, 1318-23. PubMed ID: 16775992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colorectal cancer. Screening strategies.
Gelfand DW
Radiol Clin North Am; 1997 Mar; 35(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 9087212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From screening criteria to colorectal cancer screening: what can New Zealand learn from other countries?
Shaw C; Cunningham R; Sarfati D
N Z Med J; 2008 Aug; 121(1279):84-95. PubMed ID: 18709051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colorectal cancer: screening and surveillance for high-risk individuals.
Ferrández A; DiSario JA
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2003 Dec; 3(6):851-62. PubMed ID: 14686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for colorectal cancer using faecal blood testing: varying the positive cut-off value.
Edwards JB
Pathology; 2005 Dec; 37(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16373240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Too early to recommend universal screening for colorectal cancer].
Ekelund G; Janzon L
Lakartidningen; 2003 Sep; 100(38):2922-6. PubMed ID: 14558210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Average-risk screening: is public policy compatible with individual needs?
Levin B; Hawley ST
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2000 Oct; 9(4):665-77; discussion 679-81. PubMed ID: 11008231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Screening of colorectal cancer in Finland and analysis of its cost-effectiveness].
Malila N; Anttila A; Elovainio L; Hakulinen T; Järvinen H; Paimela H; Pikkarainen P; Rautalahti M; Hakama M
Duodecim; 2003; 119(12):1115-23. PubMed ID: 12868357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening methods.
Brenner H
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S20-2. PubMed ID: 18368634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancer screening in the USA.
Smith RA
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S48-53. PubMed ID: 17227643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
