These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18754383)

  • 1. Nanofiltration for trace organic contaminant removal: structure, solution, and membrane fouling effects on the rejection of perfluorochemicals.
    Steinle-Darling E; Reinhard M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jul; 42(14):5292-7. PubMed ID: 18754383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of sorption on the rejection of trace organic contaminants during nanofiltration.
    Steinle-Darling E; Litwiller E; Reinhard M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2592-8. PubMed ID: 20218539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nanofiltration and granular activated carbon treatment of perfluoroalkyl acids.
    Appleman TD; Dickenson ER; Bellona C; Higgins CP
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():740-6. PubMed ID: 23846124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of small trihalomethane precursors from aqueous solution by nanofiltration.
    Lin YL; Chiang PC; Chang EE
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):20-9. PubMed ID: 17212977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of pesticide Endosulfan by nanofiltration: influence of organic matter-pesticide complexation and solute-membrane interactions.
    De Munari A; Semiao AJ; Antizar-Ladislao B
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3484-96. PubMed ID: 23615337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of organic fouling layer on the rejection of trace organic solutes by nanofiltration: mechanisms and implications.
    Gan Z; Du X; Zhu X; Cheng X; Li G; Liang H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):33827-33837. PubMed ID: 29948687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in water samples with nanofiltration pretreatment.
    Xu B; Li DP; Li W; Xia SJ; Lin YL; Hu CY; Zhang CJ; Gao NY
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5376-84. PubMed ID: 20619437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Membrane filtration of wastewater effluents for reuse: effluent organic matter rejection and fouling.
    Jarusutthirak C; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):225-32. PubMed ID: 11436785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling.
    Her N; Amy G; Park HR; Song M
    Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(6):1427-38. PubMed ID: 15016519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phosphorus removal using nanofiltration membranes.
    Leo CP; Chai WK; Mohammad AW; Qi Y; Hoedley AF; Chai SP
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 22053475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of solubility on the rejection of trace organics by nanofiltration membrane: exemplified with disinfection by-products.
    Kong FX; Wang XM; Yang HW; Chen JF; Guo CM; Zhang T; Xie YF
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Aug; 24(22):18400-18409. PubMed ID: 28643277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures.
    Yu Y; Zhao C; Wang Y; Fan W; Luan Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 23596950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of pH in nanofiltration of atrazine and dimethoate from aqueous solution.
    Ahmad AL; Tan LS; Abd Shukor SR
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 154(1-3):633-8. PubMed ID: 18055106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of feed water pH and membrane material on nanofiltration of perfluorohexanoic acid in aqueous solution.
    Zeng C; Tanaka S; Suzuki Y; Fujii S
    Chemosphere; 2017 Sep; 183():599-604. PubMed ID: 28575703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane fouling by natural organic matter: Mechanisms and mitigation by pre-ozonation and pH.
    Yu W; Liu T; Crawshaw J; Liu T; Graham N
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():353-362. PubMed ID: 29665507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the effluent organic matter removal of direct NF and powdered activated carbon/NF as high quality pretreatment options for artificial groundwater recharge.
    Kazner C; Wintgens T; Melin T; Baghoth S; Sharma S; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 18413940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
    Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.