231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18755068)
1. Accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors.
Nelson D; Kennedy B; Regnerus C; Schweinle A
J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(4):35. PubMed ID: 18755068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of digital arm and wrist manometers: clinical implications for the dental hygienist.
Furgeson D; Mickels-Foster N
J Dent Hyg; 2013 Oct; 87(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 24158664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two oscillometric blood pressure monitors in subjects with atrial fibrillation.
Lamb TS; Thakrar A; Ghosh M; Wilson MP; Wilson TW
Clin Invest Med; 2010 Feb; 33(1):E54-62. PubMed ID: 20144271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Omron RS6 wrist blood pressure monitor with the positioning sensor on or off with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer.
Deutsch C; Krüger R; Saito K; Yamashita S; Sawanoi Y; Beime B; Bramlage P
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Oct; 19(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 25000543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Blood pressure monitors in primary healthcare centres].
Moe N; Getz L; Dahl K; Hetlevik I
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Jun; 130(12):1233-5. PubMed ID: 20567274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement.
Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M
J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can aneroid sphygmomanometers be used at altitude?
Kametas NA; McAuliffe F; Krampl E; Nicolaides KH; Shennan AH
J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 16617312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of home blood pressure monitors in children and adolescents.
Wells TG; Neaville WA; Arnold JR; Belsha CW
Am J Med Sci; 1998 Feb; 315(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9472910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
Viera AJ; Hinderliter AL
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 17890973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
