231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18755068)
21. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings.
de Greeff A; Nathan H; Stafford N; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 19020425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ensuring the accuracy of digital sphygmomanometers for home use.
Nash CA
Mayo Clin Proc; 1994 Oct; 69(10):1006-10. PubMed ID: 7934182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The results of the campaign for evaluating sphygmomanometers accuracy and their physical conditions.
Mion Júnior D; Pierin AM; Alavarce DC; Vasconcellos JH
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2000 Jan; 74(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10935290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How accurate are sphygmomanometers?
Mion D; Pierin AM
J Hum Hypertens; 1998 Apr; 12(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 9607693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement.
Dorigatti F; Bonso E; Zanier A; Palatini P
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17303985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aneroid sphygmomanometers. An assessment of accuracy at a university hospital and clinics.
Bailey RH; Knaus VL; Bauer JH
Arch Intern Med; 1991 Jul; 151(7):1409-12. PubMed ID: 2064493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can validated wrist devices with position sensors replace arm devices for self-home blood pressure monitoring? A randomized crossover trial using ambulatory monitoring as reference.
Stergiou GS; Christodoulakis GR; Nasothimiou EG; Giovas PP; Kalogeropoulos PG
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Jul; 21(7):753-8. PubMed ID: 18443566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of two home blood pressure monitors with a mercury sphygmomanometer in an ambulatory population.
Johnson KA; Partsch DJ; Gleason P; Makay K
Pharmacotherapy; 1999 Mar; 19(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 10221371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometers in clinical usage: University of Michigan experience.
Yarows SA; Qian K
Blood Press Monit; 2001 Apr; 6(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 11433131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The accuracy of community-based automated blood pressure machines.
Van Durme DJ; Goldstein M; Pal N; Roetzheim RG; Gonzalez EC
J Fam Pract; 2000 May; 49(5):449-52. PubMed ID: 10836778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
