BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18755438)

  • 1. Adjusting mammography--audit recommendations in a lower-incidence Taiwanese population.
    Chen CY; Tzeng WS; Tsai CC; Mak CW; Chen CH; Chou MC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):978-85. PubMed ID: 18755438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
    Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completion of colorectal cancer screening in women attending screening mammography.
    Molina L; Carlos RC; Mark Fendrick A; Abrahamse PH; Dong Q; Bernstein SJ
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15561570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency and determinants of screening for breast cancer in primary care group practice.
    Love RR; Brown RL; Davis JE; Baumann LJ; Fontana SA; Sanner LA
    Arch Intern Med; 1993 Sep; 153(18):2113-7. PubMed ID: 8379802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of systematic and non-systematic ('opportunistic') screening mammography: a comparative study from Denmark.
    Bihrmann K; Jensen A; Olsen AH; Njor S; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 18416951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
    Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
    Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography and breast imaging reporting and data system on breast diseases].
    Li JG; Li S; Liu Q; Zhao TT
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 45(7):464-6. PubMed ID: 17686303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A study on scheduling periodic examinations for the early detection of breast cancer in Korea].
    Jeong SH; Kang DR; Hur NW; Kim J; Lee SY; Jung SH; Nam CM
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2006 Jul; 39(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 16910309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network.
    Poplack SP; Tosteson AN; Grove MR; Wells WA; Carney PA
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):832-40. PubMed ID: 11110951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A statistical evaluation of mammography: crucial questions for health systems.
    Watson CJ; Chesteen SA
    J Soc Health Syst; 1993; 4(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 8268470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Process indicators from ten centres in the Finnish breast cancer screening programme from 1991 to 2000.
    Sarkeala T; Anttila A; Forsman H; Luostarinen T; Saarenmaa I; Hakama M
    Eur J Cancer; 2004 Sep; 40(14):2116-25. PubMed ID: 15341987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach.
    Granader EJ; Dwamena B; Carlos RC
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 19000876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period].
    Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening complacency and compliance.
    Maurer WJ
    Wis Med J; 1995; 94(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 7625089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Annual screening mammography for breast cancer in women 75 years old or older: to screen or not to screen.
    Hartman M; Drotman M; Arleo EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1132-6. PubMed ID: 25905953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer screening in an adult literacy program.
    Johnson RM; Smith P; Strauss EJ; Higgins A; Jensen DR; Weiss BD
    Alaska Med; 2008; 49(4):126-30. PubMed ID: 18491805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of life and diagnostic imaging outcomes.
    Seidenwurm D; Rosenberg R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Apr; 7(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 20362941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.