These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18756678)
1. Numerical investigations of stress shielding in total hip prostheses. Behrens BA; Wirth CJ; Windhagen H; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Bouguecha A Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jul; 222(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 18756678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique. Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Numerical investigations of the strain adaptive bone remodelling in the periprosthetic canine femur]. Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Wefstaedt P; Nolte I Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009; 122(9-10):391-7. PubMed ID: 19863012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling. Pal B; Gupta S; New AM Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs. Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biomechanical effect of anteversion and modular neck offset on stress shielding for short-stem versus conventional long-stem hip implants. Goshulak P; Samiezadeh S; Aziz MS; Bougherara H; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 26774671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty. Wik TS Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis. Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of bone stress distribution around the hip joint prosthesis with stepped stem]. Tan R; Fan H; Wu F; Chen J; Luo J; Zhang X Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 28(4):732-6. PubMed ID: 21936371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling. Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Topological optimization in hip prosthesis design. Fraldi M; Esposito L; Perrella G; Cutolo A; Cowin SC Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2010 Aug; 9(4):389-402. PubMed ID: 20037769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. Weinans H; Sumner DR; Igloria R; Natarajan RN J Biomech; 2000 Jul; 33(7):809-17. PubMed ID: 10831755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Otani T; Whiteside LA Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Femoral Stress Changes after Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Ribbed Prosthesis: A Finite Element Analysis. Luo C; Wu XD; Wan Y; Liao J; Cheng Q; Tian M; Bai Z; Huang W Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():6783936. PubMed ID: 32280694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Load-shift--numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses. Goetzen N; Lampe F; Nassut R; Morlock MM J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 15652559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Load-transfer analysis after insertion of cementless anatomical femoral stem using pre- and post-operative CT images based patient-specific finite element analysis. Yamako G; Chosa E; Zhao X; Totoribe K; Watanabe S; Sakamoto T; Nakane N Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 24629623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of proximal femoral support in stress development within hip prostheses. Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Levine DL Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Mar; (420):176-80. PubMed ID: 15057094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Bone adaptation changes mechanical stress in the femur--a prospective two years follow up after Hüft-TEP implantation]. Lengsfeld M; Günther D; Pressel T; Leppek R; Schmitt J; Griss P Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 14551838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty]. Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]